@Thalii17 Besides whatever money laundering is happening in Fulham, he has one year left on his contract and does not seem likely to renew. Those are not good selling conditions, so realistically taking the circumstances into account, 50 million is good money.
@deejayfaremi@pudde18 At no point does it say it was used wrongly at best you can argue that it was not formally authorized and if it was used wrongly it wouldn’t be well received (this is basic logic) and they will review its future use and it will not be used again until a formal ruling on it
@Bonmatimessi Definitely something I think about, I can see blatant misinformation about a topic like football that I’m familiar with and can research fairly easily. God knows what kind of creative accounting they do with other reporting.
VAR may now review two infrequent but potentially match-changing decisions/incidents:
➡️ An incorrect red card resulting from a clearly wrong second yellow card
➡️ A player wrongly being shown a yellow or red card when the offence was committed by another player of either team; the offence itself cannot be reviewed except in the context of mistaken identity
Keep up to date with all changes: https://t.co/r8QUTgJU9c
Download the official Laws of the Game app: https://t.co/qdaCeW8Hab
@Tomidiazcueto if i had a nickel for every time argentina makes b2b finals, loses 1-0 to some dodgy refereeing, gets an argentina player red carded, and then the referee retires right after, i'd have two nickels which isn't much but its definitely odd that it's happened twice 💀
@Sheikhoooom This is a Portuguese player actually putting the team on his back but getting robbed in the semi finals by the English president of fifa, fun fact a robbery due to which England are still deservedly cursed to this day.