A non-obvious reality of the metascience trend is that it's actually two different groups: academics and entrepreneurs.
There are surprisingly few links between the two.
Bridging the two worlds will be key to making the movement matter.
https://t.co/gDnCuzlJf0
There are countless lessons to learn from @willcanine and his story of building @opentrons, including how they rose to meet the COVID moment.
https://t.co/aouJ7UYcdx
Will thought their early adopters would be biohackers and open source enthusiasts, but it was scientists.
"9 out of 10 biologists still run all their protocols by hand, and they want a machine that's for them."
An idea worth (further) testing: Equipment Supply Shocks
https://t.co/2ZrCp97EYO
They seem to work. And they can be tested for less $$ than most realize. First, they need philanthropic legibility (i.e. a name).
Liberate researchers from administrative meddling and bureaucratic overhead with fast, simple, cheap, disposable, cloud-based institutions.
Proposal from @davidtlang https://t.co/HzLF3Lq2Hc
.@kulesatony is a relentless champion for scientists and founders, but especially scientist founders. He helped ignite the enthusiasm of the founder-led biotech movement and has good ideas about where it can go next.
https://t.co/94z1WCGlmg
I've spent the past year interviewing scientists about how science is evolving (@scibetter).
And I think 1950's Hollywood is the best historical analogy for understanding the changes underway.
https://t.co/9GWuDpQQru
Something new! We’re hosting a discussion about the history and future of amateur science.
Many former @scibetter guests set to join (@vgr, @ATinyGreenCell, and more). Join us!
https://t.co/JmJ0s3TuHY