@SuperheroFreak@Darkterror196@skipper Im not out here for follows. But you replied twice to one comment about the guy with insults in both about how he is being emotional. It seems like you just want to get noticed. Are you lonely? Is that why you care about followers?
@The_Benoitnator@RockChartrand@commie_trucker Except we have improved our work structure. That's why the increases of standards of living have climbed steadily as we've advanced. You could live on a lot less but that would require doing away with all the comforts our ancestors didn't have but we do.
@Eli_Doubletap To be devils advocate, you dont want judges to over sentence for fear that something will happen to themselves if another guy does something, and depending on where you are you can vote for judges and whether they retain their position.
@tayebayly@wynrosei While I might be on the pro-life side of things, I can appreciate your take as it seems to have a more nuanced opinion then some other individuals.
@Wolffie151@JuanPab31382384@Uberclasse@ma1ybe Well you argued that any removal of the baby was an abortion which it's not. Next, the intent of the Dr's actions are what matters. Maybe you can comprehend that. Or would AI help you there? One can save the mother, that's even in the laws. Failure to act is negligence.
@Wolffie151@JuanPab31382384@Uberclasse@ma1ybe Removing the child and it stays alive is not an abortion, we are clear? Now, the child can be saved at 5 months into a pregnancy and still live, why do you choose the active murder option? It's tragic when a child is lost but that doesn't mean choose to actively have a hand in it
@Wolffie151@JuanPab31382384@Uberclasse@ma1ybe No, you can remove a child without killing it. The baby with the earliest pre me time is like 5 1/2 months; it wasn't killed and yet it was removed via surgery. You can try to save both you know and give priority to the mother. You understand that right? You don't have to murder.
@Wolffie151@JuanPab31382384@Uberclasse@ma1ybe Did you not read intent? If a person dies while they are undergoing a heart transplant, it's not murder. If the intent is to save the mother, it isn't an abortion. It is only if you intentionally kill the child in the process of the removal. I can read, can you comprehend?
@Wolffie151@JuanPab31382384@Uberclasse@ma1ybe The express purpose is to save the woman not to kill the child therefore it's not an abortion. Actually read the definition. If the child or fetus (the term you use), dies that wasnt the purpose of the procedure.
@dylanmallman How is it immoral to remove individuals who bring woman and children into various forms of slavery? I would think it's immoral to stop that.