The new ๐๐๐ tactic in Lean 4.30.0 brings call-by-value evaluation into the proof layer.
"Call-by-value" is how most software runs: arguments are computed before being passed to a function. ๐๐๐ lets you use that same model to close proof goals, and is useful for software verification, formalized math, and domain-specific verification workflows alike.
Tactic reference: https://t.co/QbQJOnwZu7
#LeanLang #LeanProver #ProofAssistant #OpenSource #FormalVerification
@seyong@malikonchain Agree. Arbitrary compliance limits that donโt follow regulatory guidance, vasps being wishywashy to bait you in, bs reasons why transactions were blocked.
If cashโ> fiat inside consumer apps was easy, it would open new opportunities.
@spengrah I think agent identity will be tied to operator identity (human in the loop). It will be many to one.
But done in a way where operator identity isn't leaked. Probably a form of ZK.
If you're interested in this, we should talk!
@ethankongee I dont entirely agree because that specific agentic task may disappear, but the agent's identity is persistent in that it will do future tasks. Identity and reputation