James Segars

Colorist/Editor/Cinematographer/Guardian

[Lue Elizondo @LueElizondo]

Friends, by now you are probably aware of the upcoming documentary, “Age of Disclosure”. This secret project has taken over two and a half exhaustive years to complete and I am proud to have played a major role in its development. I believe it has the potential to change the UAP conversation irrevocably.

The Director is Dan Farah, the Producer of Spielberg’s “Ready Player One”. I am also proud to be joined by many senior officials, many of whom risked everything to tell you the truth, to include their political careers, their professional reputations, and even their safety.

This documentary was intended to be the definitive center piece to help drive disclosure in a way like never before. It has been a rollercoaster for all involved.

Please join Dan and many others for the premier at SXSW Film Festival tomorrow. I have a previous engagement that I cannot reschedule but know that I will be with every one of you, in spirit. I encourage you to go see it and tell your friends.
@Dan_Farah @sxsw #AgeOfDisclosure

https://t.co/VAEhwx2WVa

[Tim Gallaudet @GallaudetTim]

Very excited to join @jaystratton and all of the @ageofdisclosure cast for the premiere at @sxsw tomorrow as well. This just may change the trajectory of humanity in the 21st century!

[Stuart Hameroff @StuartHameroff]

Microtubules are cylinders 25 nm in diameter with a hollow inner core about 15 nm in diameter filled with water and ions. The cylinder wall is a lattice of tubulins. The aromatic rings are inside the tubulins including close to neighboring tubulins so quantum processes can occur along and throughout the microtubule which may extend quite far in axons.

The water in the core may be ordered and coupled to microtubule dynamics and have its own quantum party.

[Josh’s News, Memes, Photography, & Stuff @joshbottweet]

@tupacabra Full hearing on it: https://t.co/f6lAoGuZbX

[Stuart Hameroff @StuartHameroff]

Great Debate at ASSC 2022??!!
You can’t be serious!

Orch OR, the only actual theory of consciousness with explanatory power, biological connection, experimental validation and upon which the other theories can converge. was specifically excluded from the debate by ASSC, and from similar ASSC events the next two years! Only cartoon neuron theories were discussed, plus IIT (which lacks even cartoon neurons, and was subsequently declared pseudoscience by 125 ASSC members). So the resultant confusion, haplessness and futility are understandable.

This demise may have begun with Anil’s 2022 Nature Reviews of Neuroscience paper on Theories of Consciousness with Tim Bayne which also excluded Orch OR. Ironically Anil now appeals to biological naturalism to explain consciousness but ignores neurobiology.

It’s explained here Anil, and more coming soon.

https://t.co/eGxdWy25jQ

[Ford Prefect @FordP100]

Why Stuart Hameroff Has the Right to Be Upset: The Epistemic Bias in Consciousness Science

The exclusion of Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) from mainstream debates on consciousness, such as the 2022 ASSC discussion, reflects a deeper epistemological flaw within contemporary cognitive science and neuroscience. Theories like Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW), Predictive Processing (PP), and Higher-Order Thought (HOT) dominate the conversation because they align with a materialist, computationalist paradigm. However, this narrow framing systematically dismisses alternative models—particularly those that engage with quantum mechanics and fundamental aspects of reality—on methodological, rather than empirical, grounds. Stuart Hameroff is right to be upset because Orch OR offers testable, biologically grounded hypotheses that connect consciousness to fundamental physics, yet it is excluded from discourse not due to falsification, but because it challenges the reigning assumptions of cognitive neuroscience.

Scientific discourse is expected to operate under principles of open inquiry and falsifiability, yet the systematic exclusion of quantum theories of consciousness suggests a form of theoretical protectionism—where computational and neural network-based models are insulated from broader scrutiny. The claim that Orch OR lacks empirical support is misleading; microtubule computations, anesthetic effects on consciousness, and quantum coherence in biological systems provide convergent evidence supporting the plausibility of Hameroff and Penrose’s framework. The dismissal of such evidence without direct engagement is not an act of scientific skepticism but a category error, wherein theories that do not fit within the dominant paradigm are excluded a priori.

The ethical harm in this exclusion is substantial. By suppressing alternative frameworks, mainstream neuroscience constrains the scope of legitimate inquiry, stifles innovation, and potentially delays breakthroughs in understanding consciousness. If Orch OR or related quantum models hold even partial truth, their exclusion retards scientific progress and diminishes the potential for interdisciplinary insights that could bridge neuroscience, physics, and philosophy. Worse, it reinforces the illusion that existing models are complete, thereby misrepresenting the state of knowledge to students, researchers, and the public. Suppressing falsifiable, biologically plausible theories creates an intellectual monoculture that mirrors historical scientific failures, such as the rejection of non-Euclidean geometry or early quantum mechanics, both of which were initially dismissed for failing to conform to prevailing intuitions.

Hameroff’s frustration is not merely personal but symptomatic of a deeper failure within consciousness research: an epistemic rigidity that prioritizes conceptual coherence within a materialist paradigm over engagement with alternative explanatory frameworks. If science is to be genuinely self-correcting, it must permit challenges to its foundational assumptions. Otherwise, it ceases to be science and becomes dogma.

[Stuart Hameroff @StuartHameroff]

Anil I said cartoon neurons plus IIT which doesn’t have any neurons, just arbitrary information. You were an advocate of IIT
but now disavow it I guess. It’s hard not to mischaracterize the position of someone who changes positions. My position has been consistent.

You claim biological naturalism but without neurobiology. How does your position differ from cartoon neurons?
What part of my position do you disagree with? So far you’ve ignored it as far as I can tell. Willful ignorance.

Criticize this:
https://t.co/eGxdWy25jQ

[Jesse Michels @AlchemyAmerican]

The great @danielsheehan45 already told us who killed JFK, why they did it and how it bizarrely relates to the Watergate scandal a decade later:

JFK was shot and killed at the behest of departed CIA director Allen Dulles (with LBJ and others’ knowledge and cooperation). This was after The Bay of Pigs and after JFK had fired Dulles and threatened to scatter the CIA to the winds. The departed Dulles, from his perch at the Brown Brothers Harriman (the investment firm that started the CIA), reoperationalized the “S Force”. The S Force was a group of exiled Cuban assassins, originally commissioned by Nixon, with the help of Howard Hughes, to take out Castro and Guevara under Eisenhower in the late 50’s (Nixon was Eisenhower’s VP). Dulles reoperationalized them in 63’ from his post at the Brown Brothers Harriman to take out JFK. Roger Morales (S Force, and one of the “men on grassy knoll”) shot JFK, not Oswald who was a trained patsy. Dulles and Co felt it was their patriotic duty to do all of this because JFK had established backchannels with Khrushchev and was threatening to defang the American nuclear arsenal. Charles Cabell was Allen Dulles’ deputy director at the CIA. His brother Earle was the mayor of Dallas when JFK was shot in 62’ (and his motorcade was rerouted). Go figure!

This connects to Watergate because Nixon got paranoid that he’d originally commissioned this S Force and would be blamed for JFK (his longtime political foe’s) death, even though the initial purpose was to take out Castro and Nixon had nothing to do with Dulles’ use of them against JFK. Nixon was doubly paranoid because Larry O’Brien, a longtime associate of Howard Hughes (again, Hughes worked with Nixon to create the S Force) was chairman of the DNC. So O’brien had kompromat on Nixon and could use it against Nixon in that election. As a result, Nixon wanted O’Brien’s phone bugged. His paranoia did him in. No other explanation for breaking into the DNC makes sense: Nixon was so far ahead of McGovern in the polls. But Watergate was REALLY pushed and executed by FBI agent G Gordon Liddy, and none other than Allen Dulles acolyte, James McCord (who was one of the burglars in the scandal). Like JFK, Nixon was at loggerheads with the CIA and wanted a major force reduction.

RFK was killed by the same forces as his brother. Sirhan Sirhan was also a patsy and an MK Ultra patient. Thane Eugene Ceasar took the shot. Also coordinated by Hughes cronies (Bob Maheu etc). @RobertKennedyJr knows this.

Let’s see if these details given to us by @danielsheehan45 get vindicated. And if we learn more about UFOs, Epstein affiliates and other dark truths too.

[James Segars @segars]

@MiraSorvino @LisaKudrow @TimFederle @DisneyStudios @robinschiff This is the best news I've heard in years! Cannot wait!

[Mira Sorvino @MiraSorvino]

Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion Sequel Is (Unofficially) a Go at 20th Century!!! I couldn’t be more excited!! ⁦@LisaKudrow⁩ ⁦@TimFederle⁩ ⁦@DisneyStudios⁩ ⁦@robinschiff⁩ https://t.co/ootSkgbk1B

[Missileman @MinuteofZombie]

At the first Sol Symposium, David Grusch called in on Zoom while he was in Austin about to interview with Joe Rogan and I got up asked him if he and Sol would endorse a multilateral UAP Weaponization ban and he agreed.

There will be no stopping weaponization of the derivative dual use technologies - AI, quantum computing, sensors, materials, power and propulsion.

But the worst things we could do with UAP technology is:

1. Put nukes on UAP

2. Turn the reactor into a bomb

When disclosure is official and public, it will be absolutely critical to engage our allies and adversaries in a new proliferation treaty the likes of which geopolitics hasn’t seen in 50 years.

I realize it may come as some surprise that a weapons designer is trying to thwart weaponization of UAP science. The reality is that humans have shown we will weaponize anything and everything. The dual use technologies and dual use science will be militarized. This is unavoidable.

But nuclear armed UAP and WMD 2.0 are avoidably stupid ideas that threaten the survival of the human race. They can and must be forbidden.

#uap

[Dan Farah @Dan_Farah]

Proud to share the trailer for The Age of Disclosure, which I directed / produced. Excited for it to premiere opening weekend of @sxsw at the Paramount Theatre. Thank you to all who participated in the film & helped make it happen! More updates soon...#AgeOfDisclosure

[Stuart Hameroff @StuartHameroff]

This declassified conjecture is all consistent with the Orch OR theory.
The states they’re
discussing would be at higher frequencies than occur in brain microtubules, as fluctuations in spacetime geometry, Faster, deeper nonlocal levels.

https://t.co/jbEasZ0qo5

[David Lynch @DAVID_LYNCH]

David Lynch, our beloved dad, was a guiding light of creativity, love, and peace. On Monday, January 20th—what would have been his 79th birthday—we invite you all to join us in a worldwide group meditation at 12:00pm NOON PST for 10 minutes.

Let us come together, wherever we are, to honor his legacy by spreading peace and love across the world. Please take this time to meditate, reflect, and send positivity into the universe.

Thank you for being part of this celebration of his life.

Love,

Jennifer, Austin, Riley and Lula Lynch

[NASA @NASA]

Keep your eye on the donut and not on the hole.

In memory of David Lynch, we will continue to explore the otherworldly and the unknown. We will focus not on the loss, but on what we gained from the years we shared this planet with you. We will see you in our dreams.

[Vincent D'Onofrio @vincentdonofrio]

This

[Shawn Ryan @ShawnRyan762]

You damaged my credibility unnecessarily with false information. That type of recklessness is irresponsible especially from a former intelligence analyst, and I hope moving forward you will keep that in mind as it will now take sometime to reestablish my credibility because of what you’ve done to me. That said, I accept your apology. I am always 100% transparent with my audience. So in the future if you have questions about any of the information I am putting into the ecosystem please feel free to contact my team and I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. Now let’s move on.

[James Segars @segars]

@ShawnRyan762 You got this, Shawn. Negativity always chases positivity. It is a fundamental law of the universe, just means you're blazing a new path and a noble one at that.

[Jesse Michels @AlchemyAmerican]

If this is real, we are already in a modern Cuban Missile Crisis… on steroids. And our government has been gaslighting us about it for a month. If it’s not, it’s an absurdly irresponsible false flag likely with the aim of undermining the incoming administration.

[James Segars @segars]

@AlchemyAmerican @jamescfox @joerogan @uncertainvector @JamieVernon @jamescfox @joerogan @AlchemyAmerican
Hope to see you all together on the show soon!