![Haqiqatjou's tweet photo. 🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUEaM6NW0AAVt30.jpg)
![Haqiqatjou's tweet photo. 🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUEaLUgXsAAiNU6.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Hoodie
@selkuki
Inquisitive & Curious advocate: 🤔As you cannot see our face, you may have a glitch or problem, go & follow the path of truth then you will see 😊.
Joined May 2022
47 Following
47 Followers
14.4K Posts
🚨🇦🇿🇹🇷🇦🇪The TRUE FACE Of SECULARISM -zi✡️nist vehicle to promote deviancy & ignorance in the world! STICK TO YOUR FAITH & Conviction or else you & your offsprings will live in slavery & ignorance for ever. The Final guidance has been given -it’s your choice! Slavery or honour?
🔴 Tek bir kareden tespit ettik: İsrail’in gizli hava üssünü ve mühimmatını nasıl bulduk?
📌 Netanyahu'nun paylaştığı kısa görüntüdeki uçak kuyruk numarası, hangar mimarisi ve zemin detaylarını inceleyerek İsrail ordusunun Tel Nof Hava Üssü'nü adım adım belirledik
📌 Peki bu uçak tam olarak nerede operasyona hazırlandı?
😎this is how one should respond to this 🐂sh^t media question;
@BlackBondPtv ⏳Cycle is completing, humans errored, lived in dark ignorance then came guidence, the light to get them out of darkness to The Final revelations, as end times are near, as stated humanity is going back into ignorance, satan make them blieve as superior but it’s their demise!⚠️
Who to follow
They @DailyMail at it again labelling a photo of right-wing pest, domestic abuser and ex-IDF soldier Avi Yemini as a “pro-Palestinian protester clashing with police”.
🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)
![Haqiqatjou's tweet photo. 🤬 How the British Correctly Predicted the Modern Middle East Crisis over 100 years ago
In their secret records, the British explicitly lay out their plan to permanently weaken the Muslim world and destroy the threat of Islam by manipulating Arabs.
Up until its collapse in the early twentieth century, the Ottoman empire was the most powerful Muslim political entity. Centered in Anatolia, and headed by the Turks, it encompassed Turkish, Arab, Berber and Kurdish lands. These included the holy Hijaz region of Makka and Madina.
The British believed that destroying Islamic power requires destroying the Ottomans. This will be done by cooperating with Arab nationalist groups. The British will get the Arabs to rebel against the Ottomans in the name of independence.
The British also believe that the Arabs themselves are not disciplined enough to unite.
Hence, after they rise up to destroy the Ottoman empire, they will then perpetually fight one another.
This will ensure that they remain weak, and never pose a threat to the British.
The British also hope to stimulate theological disagreements between the Arabs and Turks to facilitate their project.
The British hope to carry out the destruction of the Ottomans during World War I (1914-1918).
To this end, they have established relations with different Arab political figures. There are two figures they give special attention to. The first is Sharif Husayn, who at the time ruled the Hijaz region on behalf of the Ottomans. The second is Ibn Saud.
During World War I, they have both figures cooperate together against the Turks. But then after the war, they have to decide which of them will be given the Hijaz. They initially favor Sharif Husayn, but Ibn Saud strongly shows his loyalty, and they eventually decide to agree to his conquest of the Hijaz.
This British plan is laid out by T.E. Lawrence, the famous British agent in charge of organizing the Arab revolt against the Ottomans.
British secret records contain Lawrence’s plan. It is in a 1916 document titled “The Politics of Mecca.”
A relevant except is contained below:
"Sherif Hussein is not working in the British interests, except in so far as they further the particular dreams and hopes of the political party to which he belongs. His aim is the establishment of a Khalifate (not the only one) for himself, and independence for people speaking Arabic from their present irritating subjection to people speaking Turk. His aims are thus in definite opposition to the Pan-Islamic party, who are his strong obstacle, and to the Young Turk party, who are however less dangerous to his schemes: his activity seems beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate aims, the break up of the Islamic “bloc” and the defeat and disruption of the Ottoman Empire, and because the states he would set up to succeed the Turks would be as harmless to ourselves as Turkey was before she became a tool in German hands. The Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If properly handled they would remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous principalities, incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine against an outside force. The alternative to this seems to be control and colonisation by a European power other than ourselves, which would inevitably come into conflict with the interest we already possess in the Near East.
"Sherif Hussein’s activities have already been of use to us. He has held in the Yemen from attacking Aden, he has quieted the Mullali in Somaliland, he has divided the counsels of the Rashid. He has refused to preach a Jehad, or to allow the legal Jehad to be declared; he has countered, and is still countering, Turkish influence in the Hedjaz; has prevented the raiding of volunteers; and has forbidden the placarding of anti-British news in the public places of MECCA; all this obviously with a mind some day to taking the place of the Turkish Government in the Hedjaz himself. If we can only arrange that this political change shall be a violent one, we will have abolished the threat of Islam, by dividing it against itself, in its very heart. There will then be a Khalifa in Turkey and a Khalifa in Arabia, in theological warfare, and Islam will be as little formidable as the Papacy when Popes lived in Avignon."
File 53/1915 Part IV 'German War: Turkey; Caliphate etc' [159r] (314/481)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUEaM6OXIAA_Aa-.jpg)
Anita, you are smart and informed enough to know that 1,200 people were not killed by Hamas. The Israeli military killed hundreds of their own people. You know this.
You make it impossible to believe anything you say.
Your credibility is zero.
You shame our country.
Seriously, does anyone think for a second that if Hamas had been waiting in tunnels with the kind of fire power capable of doing this to cars that the IDF would have been running around Gaza the way they have been for the past 3 years?
The truth is that if Hamas had weapons capable of doing this, Hamas would be sitting in Tel Aviv today.
@RishiSunak 🤡Fu^kin 🐂sh^ter zi✡️nist disposable asset doesn’t care about the thousands being massacred everyday by the evil that prevailed Palestine!
28 Israeli attack helicopters fired blindly for hours, 945 separate attacks, over 11,000 cannon shells fired, each as big as a child’s forearm
Israel killed hundreds of its own soldiers and citizens that day and has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to try and keep that fact hidden from the Israeli public
#HannibalDirective
We are in a battle against a 3000 yr old enemy that wants to destroy western civilization.
History is our guide and knowledge is power. Name and expose our enemy and like Rumplestiltskin they can be destroyed.
Good luck to us all
Long Live The Republic
⚠️ À LA BONNE FLAMBÉE...
Elles sont sûres ces batteries lithium. Voilà qui donne envie de passer à l'électrique 😉.
سہیل آفریدی صاحب طارق بن زیاد کیطرح نکلے۔پختون قوم سلطان محمود غزنوی کی اولادوں میں سے بھی ہے۔اب ناکامی ہلاکت ہو گی۔سہیل آفریدی کی تحریک مزاحمت اپنے بام عروج پہ ہے۔
@PTIofficial @SohailAfridiISF @ShafiJanPTI @HaleemAdil @salmanAraja @PTIOfficialUSA @hasnainrafiq @nayapakistan
I never saw anything like this happen on any "Hamas" footage from "October 7"
Who paid Alex Davies-Jones MP to travel to Israel and hang out with War Criminals?😵💫
It took a little longer than expected, but we have finished the Gaza Geolocation Map. Every clip in the archive whose location we know is placed on a map of Gaza, so you can see where the footage was filmed.
It includes:
35,200+ videos and photos placed on the map.
Sources and the original post for every clip
Node map links & suggested leads
Our built-in AI iris can navigate the map
Fully searchable index
Filters by area, date, type of attack and precision
UN satellite damage survey layer (UNOSAT)
Built-in reverse image search links for each node
Downloadable dataset (CSV, GeoJSON and Google Earth)
It can be accessed here: https://t.co/4irNy85XQW
Please re-share and help us break out of the algorithm prison.
We will keep placing more of the footage as our researchers work through the rest of the archive.
Thank you to https://t.co/c8bmQF2iME, GeoConfirmed, @AbuLocation and @NemoAnno, whose geolocation work is credited on the map.
God bless all those who sacrificed their lives to get this footage out.
Join our telegram:
https://t.co/T128rcARCl
Follow our backup accounts:
@ZionismExposedx
&
@IsraelExposedAr
I can play this game too.
Define "Jews".
No one in the Bible is called a "Jew" until Mordecai -- מרדכי היהודי -- in the Scroll of Esther, historically the latest book of the Bible, set in Persia in roughly 4th century BCE, i.e. 2,500 yrs ago.
No one was "a Jew" anywhere 3,700 years ago.
The stories that we are emotionally attached to are really hard to let go of. If you want to base your worldview on actual truth, please learn more about the Bible and biblical history.
And, regardless of what the Bible says, none of it is any justification for Jews of our time to murder Palestinians and steal their land.
@mohammed_hijab Ask the 'patriots' who saved their asses. Fkg jokers would have been speaking German.
@mohammed_hijab The 'British' patriot movement is co-opted by zionists. It's a zionist civnat psyop to get lower IQs to serve Israel by hating Muslims. People know what Israel's end game is, it's Jewish empire. British and US taxpayers get poorer as the Israeli empire expands via genocide
@MarioNawfal 🤔it’s the result of the training to make them zombies unable to think or react! Because that is left to the movies.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
siti fatimah
Seen from Malaysia
Nikom
Seen from United States
Sana Khan
Seen from United States
A
Seen from Italy
LATEST MELAYU
Seen from Malaysia
ünlüler ve güzeller
Seen from Turkey
Momo
Seen from Pakistan
Fashionable Capricorn & 100% Canadian 🇨🇦
Seen from United States
Daisy
Solelover👣deluxe 
Seen from Lebanon
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.9M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers