🎉NEW ISSUE ALERT! Volume 2, Issue 4 (December 2025) of @jwls_in is out!
Featuring 6 papers on primate conservation, human-wildlife conflict, forest ecology, and more. Read the full issue: https://t.co/uSD98NArXx
@moefcc@wii_india@GobindsagarBha1@wildwithwolves
A column article by me- "The Tragedy of the Commons, and how to dodge it." I write these contemporary commentaries on influential papers and theories in #Ecology and #ConservationScience for students and interested readers. Find it here: https://t.co/CkXhxyYqLn
#Sustainability
Mr. Shivam Shrotriya (@shivam_wolf) discussed the study on ensuring wildlife connectivity across newly developed railway and road infrastructures in the Terai-Arc Landscape, focusing on case studies from Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Uttarakhand. @thewild_dodo, @paragnigam09, @wildwithwolves, @bhlab_india, @moefcc, @vrtiwari1 #Sustainability #Infrastructure.
#PhD student: Makes $30k a year. Works on weekends as well. Zero life-work balance.
"Do you think I have a chance to become a professor?"
Prof: "Yes, of course! Finish this project and we will publish excellent papers. I am sure you will easily find a faculty position."
▫️
2 years later:
Student finishes the project. Professor writes a report. Papers are published.
Student: "Do you think my CV is strong enough?"
Prof: "Yes, you are the best!"
▫️
Next 4 months:
Student submits 50 well-tailored applications for faculty positions.
Zero interviews. A lot of broken dreams.
▫️
Key takeaways:
1. Make sure you distinguish encouragement from reality.
- By encouraging you, your advisor may unintentionally give you too much hope. Keep a cool head.
2. Always ask other faculties for external opinion on your case.
- Your advisor’s opinion is always biased. Look for more input outside your group.
3. Don’t expect fairness during candidate selection.
- Hiring process is subjective by definition. It is done by people with very different views on who is the best. You may put tons of efforts into a research statement only to find out later that no one really reads it.
4. The reality is brutal.
- Departments can receive 300-500 candidates per opening. Many have excellent CVs and cool ideas. At top- and mid-rank universities, selection criteria can become extremely questionable (like, who exactly was your PhD advisor? Is your recomm. letter 3 pages long? etc).
And there is no need to say “You don’t know anything about it. It’s not like this”.
I went through this myself. Many times. Along with many colleagues.
Do not expect fairness. See luck as a big factor.
Apply broadly but have a backdoor ready.
#AcademicTwitter
Bird nests made from anti-bird spikes! 🤯 Even for me as a nest researcher, these are the craziest bird nests I've ever seen. Today my paper came out on this rebellious behaviour. And it's like telling a joke...
A thread. 🧵
Amazing paper! "Wolves are the most politicized species. They are used as a political symbol and as a scapegoat for a number of socially significant political issues".., and other cool symbolic meanings of wolves gathered in one paper
https://t.co/rlDRfPPAID
Wolf is top predator of Thar Desert and #GIB landscape. We are occasionally able to spot them, here is one Wolf feeding on a skin of dead livestock. Thanks to volunteer network of @and_ecology for sending this video.
📓Third paper from my PhD is out today.
We talked about vocalisation behavioural responses of wolves to anthropocene. The paper also gives a guidelines for active acoustics survey for 🐺.
https://t.co/dx1ZffLV2t
@shaheerkhan@wildwithwolves#Wolves#ecology#behaviour#howl