@SBA_Ray Living this right now and it’s so true - some lenders engage deeply, tell you what needs to change. They’re actively making the deal better for ME.
They bring a ton of experience - have been my best advisors so far.
@tax_zack@ClintFiore ‘They’re rich, burnt out and focusing on real estate investments’ sure sounds like retiring to me.
Buyer wants to know 1) the biz isn’t a time bomb, and 2) sellers won’t compete. Lots of ways to manage those concerns, right?
@SeanODowd15 I would do this - background in banking, underwriting, FP&A.
Keys to success include 1) adding greater value with sensitivities, deck-building, strategy, 2) assuring steady volume, and 3) finding cheaper talent to scale beyond a solo shop.
Do you have a project to get started?
@BetterCeo@ConnorAbene Interested in answers from others - my experience is that it’s easy to redo accounts on a go-forward basis, and excruciating to do any kind of updates to prior data.
@DavidSacks Concentration. Of funding. In a volatile industry. Even venture capitalists know to look for those kinds of risks.
If Washington was the problem, SVB would be one of a hundred banks in its position. It’s not.
Blaming Washington is silly, though predictable.
@KevinPOBrien @rfw_arcana Accounting rule is that if you are holding to maturity, you don’t have to mark bonds/MBS to market value. And for good reason - you’ll never actually realize those losses.
So yes, sort of. That problem was compounded by their mismatch on fixed/floating and duration.
@rohindhar Good deal in hindsight.
But if I were looking at a similar deal today it would be irresponsible to underwrite that level of appreciation. Without a crystal ball, I wouldn’t do the deal.