@YossarianLocker@datingbyblaine Oh, they do want them. But the ranking is now "on their terms" above "not at all" above "on the guy's terms" instead of, in effect, the other way 'round.
@omooretweets The "doesn't improve lock-in" point is flat out wrong IMHO. NSFW users/authors/what-have-you are not doing SFW stuff on GPT when they can't do what they want. They use inferior models who don't hobble them.
@7459Ub@deepfates A military entity that wants unconstitutional surveillance capabilities and unfettered killbots is no longer in the Defense business.
@rapid_rar2@allTheYud Yes. It's too complicated. These things have billions of parameters and they are not deterministic. You'd have to prove that all mostly-likely paths through that maze are mostly-aligned, not just one. A computer that can do that would be the size of a planet. Literally.
@saltedshow@JonErlichman@toottootchoo My go-to store offers a 26GB disk for €15 per TByte. Close enough to count as a hit. If that's not sufficient, check back in a few months.
@MultiLeninist@patio11 The AI knows what the labels on bottles look like and can omit them if prompted, but it'll keep all the other fun stuff it's trained on intact, lighting and sizes and whatnot. More or less anyway.
In post, edit a heap of bottle to still look reasonable? Have fun. You'll need it.
@petruspennanen@larcenblack@ray4tesla Also, LIDAR gets scattered by rain and can't see well through snow either. You'd need radar for that. Which has its own problems (poor resolution, very selective echoes depending on what it hits).
@petruspennanen@larcenblack@ray4tesla Oh come on.
Simple fact: A human needs to drive slowly enough to stop in their range of vision. An autonomous car needs to do the same thing, to co-exist on the roads safely. So how would a car that sees better than a human help?
@kevinnbass@repligate "Just math" in the same vein that chemistry is just applied physics, and biology is just applied chemistry, and psychology … and sociology … and history …
People still seem to think that (the equivalent of) a degree in physics is sufficient to debate a historian.