@arthur_mc2@AllisonPearson Spot on Arthur.
The Labour party’s own video about it featured a woman saying she would be able to go for coffee with friends with the time saved not giving her child breakfast.
That’s a lifeline right there.
@Labourheartland TBH, if you’re going to assert something in future, can I suggest you research it first rather than post inaccurate information, otherwise it just undermines your credibility.
@Labourheartland Fairness work both ways. Towards an inexperienced employee training to do a job and from an employee who is the beneficiary of that training.
Your information about Germany is incomplete.
@Labourheartland Maybe that reflects your lack of experience and skills you have to offer?
If I’m an employer, why should I have to pay the same to experienced & inexperienced staff? The lower wage reflects the time I have to spend bringing them on.
@AlistairCarns Is it any wonder we can’t have a sensible debate about anything when idiots like you, who ought to know better, post dog whistle shite like this?
@Ed_Miliband The problem, as ever with Labour,is it’s just more subsidies, none of the measures you describe are a real reduction in costs, merely financial transfers to the less well off from “those with the broadest shoulders”.
Your economic incompetence is revealed every time you speak.
@diamonddemola@Madness1861@TaraBull UK.
No problem buying a house here in the name of 1 party to a marriage. If they divorce the other party may have a claim on the house though.
@KathrynDW59@GaryCla79663245@Steven_Swinford Don’t you think it would be a good thing if, just once, a Labour politician talked about cutting spending, instead of the solution to EVERY problem is to raise tax?
@amazon It’s really not on for your delivery drivers to leave gates open and allow our dogs to escape on the the road outside. Especially when there have been people in the house all day. The gate will be padlocked in future.