Sparkplu9

[CasiTrades 🔥 @CasiTrades]

🚨 I Still Think XRP Needs One Final Low! 🚨

ripple:native is finally getting some momentum off the $1 area, but in my opinion, it still isn't enough to invalidate the $0.87 support.

📉The macro timeframes have printed the bullish divergence you'd expect near a major market pivot and I'm becoming increasingly excited about what comes next - But what's missing is the smaller timeframes...

Right now, I still think they need one final wave down so that bullish divergences can align across multiple timeframes. $0.87 is the most likely level for the final low.

We're getting very close. This weekend could be one of the most important periods of the entire correction. A final move into support would likely come with high volatility, but it could also set the stage for a very powerful reaction. 😍

In the short term, we're testing $1.09 as support. Personally, I still think that level breaks before this correction is finished.

The good news is whether the final low is at $1.00, $0.93, or $0.87, the bigger story is that the market is preparing for a major pivot towards new ATHs!!
#CryptoMarket #xrpnewstoday

[Krippenreiter @krippenreiter]

Without proper confirmation it sadly means nothing because this can all be done by anyone.

Also no multisig set which is not a good sign.

Token also already launched while the official P/R said it's going to happen later this year?

--> Red flag.

Be careful, don't set a trustline and wait for confirmation. Don't rush into anything that isn't real yet.

[Cryptoinsightuk @Cryptoinsightuk]

ripple:native has 2 hours to close its daily candle.

If it closes here or above it looks good in the short term.

Going to hurt to watch it go up after it stopped me out here yesterday.

However, I am willing to take this sacrifice on behalf of my brothers if this marks the bottom

[Vet @Vet_X0]

The Batch amendment for the XRP Ledger is BACK! 😈

Massive shoutout to Denis and the whole core dev community for prioritizing the rework with huge amounts of security audits.

Batch allows for atomic transaction bundling allowing Peer2Peer swaps and monetization.

[Denis Angell @angell_denis]

Batch is BACK!!

After an attack-athon, a security audit, and 4 reviews batch is officially merged back into the xrpld repo and will be up for voting in the next release.

"A man who has committed a mistake and doesn't correct it is committing another mistake." - Confucius

[Matt Hamilton @HammerToe]

@uttam_singhk The original concept behind the XRP Ledger and the reason it allows anyone to issue stablecoins and has a built-in DEX was because they thought every bank would want to issue its own stablecoin. At the time, the banks didn't. Seems XRP Ledger was 15 years ahead of the trend.

[evernorthxrp @evernorthxrp]

1/5 The worry we keep hearing: as RLUSD grows on XRP, RLUSD starts to eat XRP. We pulled every RLUSD trade on-chain to check. To date, the data shows the opposite. 🧵

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. This content may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties; actual results may differ materially. Digital assets involve risk, including potential loss of principal. Learn more about Evernorth: https://t.co/f1nPiu5BZ8.

[WrathofKahneman @WKahneman]

🔥Stablecoin war!🔥OpenUSD is an effort to offer a USD stable by a consortium of partners, a who's who of FI's & xborder paycos, including @Ripple. Forbes cites Solana & Stellar, Base, Polygon +more as issuing chains. Not XRPL. It may be a watershed moment!
& ripple:native ?
1/7

[Eleanor Terrett @EleanorTerrett]

Might be a hot take, but I didn’t read the @jpmorgan blog post as backing the Clarity Act, as some have suggested.

While the authors praised digital assets for their potential to enable tokenization and modernize financial infrastructure, they stopped short of endorsing any specific legislation, instead advocating more broadly for a digital asset market structure “framework” with stronger safeguards, while echoing concerns JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has previously raised about stablecoin yield and illicit finance.

The line that stood out to me was the paragraph immediately after the authors outlined the bank’s digital asset initiatives: “Responsible innovation is already possible within existing guardrails, and it can scale further with the right framework in place.”

To me, that suggests JPM believes it can already innovate responsibly under today’s regulatory framework, while viewing market structure legislation as beneficial if it also addresses long-standing concerns around stablecoin yield and illicit finance.

[James E. Thorne @DrJStrategy]

The Clarity Act.

The Doomers keep insisting the Clarity Act will never pass, that Team Warren and Dimon will win, and that is the responsible outcome. What they miss is that the real winner in that scenario is not “prudence,” it is China. Just as those who project that voter ID is inherently controversial often ignore the basic issue of who sets the rules of the system, control the game. Many of today’s critics overlook a simple fact: if the US does not set the standards in the crypto and digital-asset world, Beijing will be more than happy to step in.

America has a history of turning strategic advantages into self-inflicted wounds, from handing transistor know‑how to allies who became competitors after WWII, to letting semiconductor manufacturing drift offshore. It is now flirting with a repeat in digital finance.

The Clarity Act is not about blessing every new token; it is about whether US capital markets and the dollar sit at the centre of the next financial architecture, or end up operating on rails designed somewhere else.

Seen through that lens, passing the Clarity Act is less about placating “crypto bros” than about avoiding another quiet own goal in a domain that will shape money, markets, and power for decades.

[Common Prefix @CommonPrefix]

Latest from our consensus work with @XRPLF:

This week, we completed the translation of the xrpld consensus implementation into scientific pseudocode. Next up is formally analyzing the protocol.

We’ll share more as the analysis progresses.

[xpmarket.com @xpmarket]

👾 XPMarket has voted YES on XLS-65 and XLS-66!

🚀XPMarket is backing native lending on the XRPL.
These amendments bring Single Asset Vaults and an on-chain Lending Protocol directly to the ledger, unlocking yield, liquidity pools, and credit markets with no external smart contracts needed.

💪The future of XRPL DeFi is being built, and we're proud to back it.

[CoinsKid @Coins_Kid]

This still remains my primary outlook for #XRP its has been for many years.

A wave 2 correction at the all-time high, we are now in the nasty C wave pulling back if $xrp can hold the July 2024 low, the next big move up sends #xrp into price discovery as it marches on towards that $27 target I have had since March 2020.

The bullmarket support keeps moving up to invalidate my theory.

STAY TUNED CKC

[J. Ayo Akinyele @ja_akinyele]

A quick clarification on Lending Protocol v1.1, since there is some confusion.

To be clear, v1.1 is an enhancement to the Lending Protocol, not a replacement for v1.0, and not a reason to hold off on v1.0 today.

The protocol works as designed. v1.1 enhances it: refinements and added flexibility driven by ecosystem feedback and where we want lending on XRPL to go. It ships as a separate amendment that extends the existing protocol. v1.0 will not be deprecated, and supporting it now will enable institutions and developers to deploy lending applications and use cases on mainnet.

Lending on XRPL will evolve dynamically. As the ecosystem's needs change, future enhancements will follow the same additive pattern: new amendments that build on what's live, rather than replacing it.

Activation follows the normal amendment process. There's no dependency that requires waiting for v1.1 before acting on v1.0. Each amendment is reviewed on its own merits and on validators normal cadence.

More details to come in a write-up...

[Krippenreiter @krippenreiter]

Such a heartbreaking tragedy in Venezuela. 😔

My heart goes out to all the people that lost their lives a few hours ago. 💔

Fingers crossed for more people to get rescued and global support to reach the families that are in dire need right now.

[CasiTrades 🔥 @CasiTrades]

🚨 The Move We've Been Waiting For Is Here! 🚨

The market is dropping hard, exactly the type of move we've been preparing for, and ripple:native is approaching the major support levels we've been tracking! 😍

Key levels below:
$1.00
$0.93 where my buy is
$0.87 (primary target/macro .854)
This is THE MOST critical moment in the market cycle!

📉Correction is approaching its final level. The fear will be LOUD! People will likely start calling for lower and lower prices as the level is reached. They'll tell you the market is going to zero. But don't let someone else's fear cause you to miss your own opportunity.

Every major trend begins when sentiment is at its worst. The correction is doing exactly what it should. This is perfect market structure.

Stay focused. We're SO close!
#Xrppriceprediction #xrpholders #CryptoMarkets

[moonkie 🌙 @xmoonkie]

Ripple could do a lot more to support builders on the XRPL

My efforts and the projects I have helped built have easily brought in thousands of new users and $100+ million dollars in revenue to Ripple's XRP sales

As the biggest stakeholder and beneficiary of the XRPL, Ripple has failed to set up any meaningful way to support back builders in the ecosystem

Here is a list of Ripple's initiatives and my thoughts on them:

1) @XAODAOLLC

XAO DAO is an initiative for the community to vote on proposals. In theory this sounds nice, but in practice this requires a lot more thought and effort to achieve.

Here are the main issues I see with this initiative:

- The voting system appears to be easy to manipulate. What stops someone with a lot of XRP from voting multiple times through different wallets?
- The system depends on active voters. Why should people care enough to read lengthy proposals and vote?
- The system is blocked by inactive voters. How are inactive voters dealt with?
- Once a bad proposal passes, why should disenfranchised voters vote again? What stops a majority of voters from voting on bad proposals over and over again?
- No clear pathway for builders. How much can XAO DAO fund? Why spend time and resources applying, promoting XAO DAO, publicly sharing business plans, all for not even reaching a voting quorum?

XAO DAO appears to have big obstacles to overcome. Getting to a place where the system works and it's generally fair could take a long time.

More about XAO DAO
https://t.co/ZlOGwlpJ2q

2) @XRPL_Commons

XRPL Commons offers two main support mechanisms for builders that I'm aware of: The Aquarium, and Glow.

The Aquarium

The Aquarium is a 9-week in-person incubator in Paris. They are at Cohort 9, so it appears the program has run 9 times. On the website it's unclear who has participated in the previous cohorts, or if they have received any funding.

My main issue with this program is the significant time and resources commitment it requires. You are asking projects to relocate to another country for 2+ months to focus on the incubator. It seems like a good program for university students, but a significant opportunity cost for businesses, unless some funding is guaranteed.

More about The Aquarium
https://t.co/Z5I1zrOSlS

Glow

The Glow program rewards people who have contributed to the XRPL in the past. This is a good idea, but so far it has been poorly executed.

Similar to XAO DAO, the voting system for Glow appears to be easy to manipulate. What stops someone from voting multiple times through different wallets?

Glow allows anyone to make a submission. I submitted @RL_Tracker, received no response, and the project never went up for a vote.

Other people report the same - making their submissions and never hearing back nor seeing them up for voting.

Yet, in a recent article XRPL Commons writes "the pipeline of new projects was thinner than we hoped."

You look at the contributions up for voting and it's almost the same projects over and over again every wave https://t.co/rnynWpeMpH

The parties who decide who goes up for voting essentially decide who gets funding

Putting aside the poor execution of this program, the grant amounts are also small. I believe they go as high as $5k if you make some major contribution? It is also unclear who has gotten what on each wave, since that information isn't readily available on their website.

More about Glow
https://t.co/CB84q7KqDz

-

3) XRPL Grants and XRPL Accelerator

The XRPL Grants and XRPL Accelerator program are the official programs offered by Ripple, but they appear to be paused or shut down.

Their website https://t.co/SQWiL1FttT states: "Applications for the XRPL Grants and XRPL Accelerator Programs are now closed. Stay tuned for new programming to be announced in Spring 2026."

It's now Summer 2026 and no new programming has been announced as far as I'm aware.

The XRPL Grants and XRPL Accelerator programs are actually quite good. You apply and you get a response back. The grant amounts are significant, up to $200k last I checked. The judges are people highly involved in the ecosystem. The projects awarded are transparently announced and posted on their website.

The biggest downside of these programs is that they're really slow. From application to grant disbursement (if you win one) can easily take 6 to 10 months, and the application process itself takes significant time and effort.

Nonetheless, the XRPL Grants and XRPL Accelerator programs are programs I can recommend, but the programs appear to be closed at this time.

-

To conclude, as the biggest stakeholder and beneficiary of the XRPL, @Ripple has failed to support back the builders that support them.

In an industry where speed matters, experiments like XAO DAO, The Aquarium, and Glow might take years to get anywhere, if they ever get anywhere. Half the ecosystem might die before any of these programs produce any tangible results.

There is currently no meaningful path for new or existing builders to find funding on the XRPL.

[Vet @Vet_X0]

$JPYSC has not been publicly announced to come to the XRP Ledger under a known issuer address.

This means any similar ticker on the XRPL is a scam. Be on the lookout of scammers using this ticker especially given SBI proximity to XRP.

[Halborn @HalbornSecurity]

We are proud to share that we have completed our XRP Ledger Lending Protocol Re-Audit for @Ripple! 🔐

The Lending Protocol is an XRP Ledger DeFi primitive that enables on-chain, fixed-term, uncollateralized loans using pooled funds from a Single Asset Vault.

[Vet @Vet_X0]

Native Loans and Yield protocol on the XRP Ledger with XLS-66 and XLS-65.

XRP Builders have been cooking hard through the market cycle.

Only the beginning folks 😈😈😈