How can the same person be in two places at once?
Delhi Police's facial recognition flagged 2,873 people as having criminal records at the Jantar Mantar protests. 25 of them were already in jail at the time. No legal backing. No accountability. An 80% "match" treated as proof. IFF has an RTI pending, transferred 14 times, still unanswered. We're demanding this list be withdrawn and a moratorium on facial recognition surveillance.
हा कोणता सांस्कृतिक महोत्सव?
दहीहंडीच्या नावाखाली संपूर्ण कात्रज चौक जाम केला आहे. दोन्ही बाजूंना काही किलोमीटर रांगा लागल्या आहेत. डीजे, प्लाझ्मा आणि सर्व काही. मुळात एवढा रहदारीचा रस्ता अडविण्याची परवानगी दिली कोणी? गृहराज्यमंत्री येथे येणार आहेत. कळले ना का बंदी हवी.
#pune
Can you believe that the income of 6 small Gujarat-based parties exceeded that of national parties (minus BJP) in 2023-2024?
Investigation into the strange world of India's paper parties:
https://t.co/lAN5b2XDSD
#ExpressInvestigation | Delhi Police told the Supreme Court its facial recognition system flagged 2,873 people with criminal records at protest, assured no action without verification.
An Express verification shows at least 25 on that list, facing serious charges, were in jail.
Express Investigation by: Mahender Singh Manral
Read full Express Investigation: https://t.co/kRRDgSsrjA
This is extraordinary and deeply disturbing.
Delhi Police’s facial-recognition system identified at least 25 people accused of murder, rape and attempted murder as being present at the Jantar Mantar protests - even though they were actually sitting in jail.
That leaves only two possibilities, and both are deeply alarming:
1. The technology is dangerously unreliable. The very system Delhi Police is using to identify and potentially target protesters in Delhi and across the country is so flawed that it is identifying people who were not even at the protest as having been there.
OR
2. The technology isn’t the problem. The police is. Criminals and thugs were deliberately brought to the protest site to provoke violence, create disorder and malign the students’ cause.
Either way, this demands answers.
If the technology is this unreliable, why is Delhi Police using it to profile protesters?
And if the technology is accurate, how did people who were demonstrably sitting in jail end up being identified as protesters at Jantar Mantar?
Delhi Police cannot have it both ways.
It owes the country an answer.
Delhi Police must answer: Why did the police ask Shaheen and Nafeesa their names and then beat them? Why were they subjected to such inhuman treatment?
Is Delhi Police acting as an extension of the RSS to harass minorities?
Courts have granted 5 days police remand for Santosh Pandit …
A heavy price to pay
“For exposing corruption and incompetence of Chandrakant Patil and Fadnavis … “
Murder’s, Rapist, Gangsters roam free
संतोष पंडित यांना ५ दिवसांची पोलीस कोठडी…!
पंडित आणि बापट यांच्या समर्थनार्थ आज, ४ सप्टेंबर रोजी, सायंकाळी ६ वाजता.
📍 कलाकार कट्टा, FC रोड, पुणे येथे
सर्वपक्षीय निषेध आंदोलन! ✊
अन्यायाविरोधात आवाज उठवणा��्या प्रत्येकाच्या पाठीशी आपण उभे राहूया.
सत्याच्या लढ्यात एकजूट दाखवूया! 💐
#SantoshPandit #Bapat #निषेधआंदोलन #FCroad #Pune सत्यासाठी_लढा
DCP Sachin Sharma gave a free pass to the goons at Jantar Mantar, refusing to take action or arrest any of them.
When our representatives went to speak to him, he threatened them, saying, “Ek baar tum aur Dipke haath lago, will beat you black and blue.”
He is also the same officer who allowed a truck loaded with stones to be parked at Jantar Mantar before the march.
He is the blue eyed boy of the regime.
Dear @CPDelhi@DelhiPolice,
Celebrating Mirzapur’s crime bosses as an “Always Ready” role model says plenty about the culture being normalized and it is a direct provocation and intent to cause unrest .
On Sept 2, 2026, Delhi Special Cell registered a suo motu FIR against me under Section 192 BNS. If Section 192 truly targets provocation and unrest then this quoted tweet meets the threshold of provocation under BNS 192.
Does the rule of law apply without fear or favor? Initiate equal suo motu action against this handle.
सरकारच्या चुकीच्या धोरणाविरोधात, राजकीय नेत्यांच्या भ्रष्टाचाराविरोधात आवाज उठवणाऱ्या संतोष पंडित यांना पुणेकरांनी खंबीरपणे साथ दिली पाहिजे.
पुणेकरांनो या माणसासाठी रस्त्यावर उतरा. नाहीतर भविष्यात कोणीही दुसरा व्यक्ती चुकीच्या गोष्टींविरोधात आवाज उठवू शकणार नाही.
When this attack happened, I personally went to the DCP and asked him to arrest these goons. The DCP replied, “We can’t arrest people randomly.”
I told him, “The attack happened right in front of the police. How can you say you can’t arrest them?”
To which the DCP replied, “You are free to go to the courts”
Such is the attitude of Delhi Police.
The Press Club of India, Indian Women’s Press Corps, Delhi Union of Journalists,
Press Association, and Kerala Union of Working Journalist strongly condemn and
call for punitive action against Delhi Police officials posted at the Saket Police Station,
including the Station House Officer (SHO), for brutally assaulting freelance journalists
Shaheen Khan and Nafisa Khan while they were reporting about the inauguration of a
new wing at the Max Hospital in Saket by Home Minister, Amit Shah and Delhi Chief
Minister, Rekha Gupta.
With Shaheen and Nafisa who faced brutal assault at the hands of Delhi Police today.. we will ensure the FIR is filed against the communal and violent police personnel involved.
This is nothing but a communal targeting of two Muslim Women Journalists simply for reporting the truth!