Błeszyńscy = drobna szlachta z PL środkowo zach., Sieradz Kalisz. Ostatnio odkryłem starsze ślady sprzed XIV wieku, potwierdzajace te które spaliły się u dziadka na Poznańskiej w1944. Nazywali się Werszowcy od Czeskiej wymowy słowa Vrše ( Ursi) Ród możno władczy posiadający grody Warszawa i Solec. Przyszli z Czech. Pierwszy herb: Rawicz, a później po utracie (konfiskacie) Warszawy około 1330 zmienili nazwisko na Błachy ( = Włosi ) i herb na Oksza i Suche Komnaty. Po 1330-tych latach musieli sie ukrywać bo mężczyźni Werszowcy byli częścią Zakonu Templariauszy, co wiem na podstawie pieczęci jakiej używali. Nigdy potem, po delegalizacji Zakonu, żaden Błeszyński nie zajmował więcej stanowisk państwowych/królewskich, o ile wiem!
Pragnę zwrócić uwagę że za każdym razem jak tylko zmierzaliśmy do jakiegoś wspólnego przedsięwzięcia z Ukrainą lub paktu, zawsze coś się działo co to uniemożliwiało! W latach 90-tych jak prezydent Ukrainy zaczął nieoficjalnie wspominać o pakcie wojskowym z Polska (a Ukraina miała wtedy atomówki!) , tak się dziwnie i "przypadkowo" złożyło że Nato zgodziło się nas przyjąć, i zrobili to zadziwiająco szybko! Natomiast Ukrainę szybko rozbroili...
Dalej w latach 2000-nych zaczęły się negocjacje do akcesji Ukrainy do EU i program Partnerstwo Wschodnie w 2009-tym, z głównym udziałem Polski. I tez zupelnie przypadkowo nastąpił szereg zdarzeń takich jak np. "przypadkowa" katastrofa Polskiego samolotu rządowego w 04/2010, a jak to nie pomoglo to po obaleniu rządu na Ukrainie w 2014-tym, zaczeto przemianowywac ulice na nazwiska pewnych watpliwych "bohaterow" narodowych Ukrainy z lat 40-tych... Zjawisko zupełnie nowe i zapewne narzucone odgórnie, którego przedtem nie było bo Ukraińców chyba zawsze bardziej interesował czas teraźniejszy (t.j. jak przeżyć) niz historia.
Następnym punktem zwrotnym była próba prezydenta Andrzeja Dudy w 2023-cim o integracji administracyjnej dwóch krajów, która zapaliła wszystkie czerwone światła alarmowe w centralach Globalizmu i pewnie Światowego Forum Ekonomicznego. Odwet był natychmiastowy - czyjeś "zręczne ręce" jakiegoś Ukraińskiego magnata, prawdopodobnie Jermaka (ale nie mam pewności) zaczęły masowy dumping Ukraińskiego zboża do Polski czym rozwścieczył Polskich rolników co spowodowało przegrane wybory PiS'u i utratę prezydentury pana Dudy.
Obecna akcja Ukraińskiej oligarchii przeciwko Polsce jest najprawdopodobniej wywołana perspektywą końca wojny po czym ostatnią rzeczą jaka Globalizm sobie by życzył byłoby przejęcie przez Polskę inicjatywy ekonomicznej i integracji w regionie. Najchętniej widzieliby pewnie całkowite zamknięcie granicy.
Napisze tutaj tezę która wyda się jeszcze bardziej konspirologiczna niż powyższy tekst, ale jestem przekonany że istniały i istnieją siły polityczne na Świecie działające w tle dynastii królewskich, oligarchii władzy a nawet obecnie w ramach WEF'u, które nie tylko torpedowaly Rzeczpospolitą jako regionalnego suwerena juz od polowy 17-go wieku , pilnując aby się nigdy nie odrodziła, ale także konspirowały w celu fizycznej eliminacji Polaków i innych ludów Europy Wschodniej, w tym naszych braci Aszkenazów, Cyganów i innych!
SMB 3/06/2026
@mikeonbike23@dwolosiuk Dlaczego nie są? Czy prezydent Żeleński naprawde sam to obmyslil, akurat teraz kiedy wojna się kończy? Bardzo wątpię że działa sam, ani że jest to wynik popularnego poparcia dla gloryfikacji dawnych UPOwców. Ktoś za tym stoi, kto?
Most of the West was wrong about Russia.
You should have listened to voices coming from Poland…
There is one other thing most of the West doesn’t understand:
Communism.
Many in the West think it is just about the abolition of private property.
It isn’t.
That is just one of its visible consequences.
Most in the west do not realize the perniciousness of communism – again, you should listen to those who experienced it first hand and try to understand it on a deeper level:
Communism is about distorting reality through lies, propaganda, and the systematic corruption of truth.
It is about demoralizing both individuals and entire societies – and this is done using the most insidious means: pitting people against each other, inciting resentment and hatred, and practicing negative selection – the systematic promoting of the least honest, most corrupt and most immoral to positions of influence and power.
It is about destroying nations from within.
Ultimately, it is about the concentration of absolute power.
Communism is a cancer on every society that it touches.
A hostile civilizational force – an enemy civilization in fact – destroying people, nations and all the value-creating and life-enhancing structures in between.
And post-communism is almost just as bad – keeping most of the original habits and pathologies under a veneer of lies…
@Kristof_Poland True!
Prussia was the real cancer of individual freedom, not Russia. Incidentally both countries shared a common "Black" upper aristocracy (since Romanovs).
Prussia expanded dramatically. The state that valued discipline, bureaucracy, and central coordination absorbed territories from Poland – a polity famous for political pluralism and decentralization.
The next decisive step came in the nineteenth century.
Germany was not unified by merchants, city leagues, or voluntary federations. It was unified by Prussia.
When Otto von Bismarck created the German Empire in 1871, the institutions of the new nation were overwhelmingly Prussian. The army was Prussian. Much of the bureaucracy was Prussian. The governing ethos was Prussian.
The result was that Prussia ceased to be merely a state inside Germany.
Germany became, to a significant degree, an enlarged Prussia.
This did not eliminate Germany’s regional diversity. Bavaria remained Bavaria. Hamburg remained Hamburg. The Rhineland remained distinct. Yet the dominant political culture increasingly reflected Prussian assumptions: respect for order, trust in administration, admiration for organization, and belief in the capacity of the state to coordinate society.
What makes this history especially important is the continuity that followed.
The German Empire collapsed in 1918.
The Weimar Republic replaced it.
The Third Reich replaced Weimar.
After 1945, both East and West Germany emerged.
Then reunification created modern Germany.
Yet across these transformations, remarkable institutional continuities persisted. Ministries survived. Administrative traditions survived. Universities survived. Professional civil services survived. Industrial and financial networks survived. Elite families often adapted to new political realities while remaining influential within the bureaucracy, military, academia, law, and business.
Regimes changed faster than institutions.
The names on buildings changed. The underlying machinery often remained.
This continuity helps explain why Germany repeatedly gravitates toward solutions based on coordination, planning, bureaucratic expertise, and administration. Across very different eras, German political culture has often assumed that social problems result from insufficient organization and can be solved through better systems.
In Britain and later America, a different instinct became dominant. Competition itself was often viewed as productive. Rival interests, rival businesses, rival political factions, and decentralized decision-making were expected to generate order spontaneously.
Germany tended to place greater faith in organized competence.
From this perspective, the German historical trajectory appears as a long chain of institutional inheritance. The military hierarchy of the Teutonic Order evolved into the administrative discipline of Prussia. Prussian institutions shaped German unification. German institutions survived repeated regime changes. And the preference for coordination over spontaneous competition remained visible through each transformation.
Whether one judges this tradition as a strength or a weakness is a separate question.
But viewed historically, the roots of Germany’s top-down political instinct reach far deeper than modern politics. They extend back through Prussia, through the frontier state that Prussia inherited, and ultimately to the military-bureaucratic world of the Teutonic Order itself.
2/2
Leftism-communism is the most insidious destructive force in action in our world.
Most of the West still doesn’t get it.
They reduce communism to a failed economic theory about abolishing private property.
That’s only a surface symptom.
The Core Mechanism: War on Truth and Human Nature
Communism is a civilizational cancer:
at its heart, it’s a machine for distorting reality through constant lies, propaganda, and the systematic corruption of truth.
History is rewritten, language is twisted, statistics are falsified, and inconvenient facts are memory-holed.
It demoralizes societies by pitting people against each other, weaponizing resentment, and practicing negative selection – elevating the most corrupt, dishonest, and immoral into positions of power.
Honest, competent, and morally grounded people are systematically sidelined or destroyed.
The system promotes the ambitious sociopaths, the ideologues, the liars, and the conformists who will parrot the party line. In the Soviet Union and its satellites, this created the nomenklatura – a brutal and cynical immoral elite. Talent, integrity, and productivity became liabilities.
Communism is anti-national.
It destroys nations from within: hollowing out families, culture, merit, and institutions – everything that creates value and enhances life – while concentrating absolute power in the hands of the worst.
Those who lived it – in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, the Baltics – understood this viscerally and warned us. They saw the doublethink, the engineered hatred, the inversion of human nature.
The body count is ~100 million. But the deeper kill is spiritual: trust eroded, excellence punished, reality itself subordinated to the pursuit of raw power.
Today’s leftism is the same pathogen in softer form – through academia, media, bureaucracy, and identity grievance – masquerading as compassion while practicing predation.
Post-communism proves the damage lingers:
Post-communist societies often kept the underlying pathologies: cynicism, corruption, distrust, and a habit of doublethink and lying beneath a thin veneer of normalcy.
It is anti-human, anti-truth, and anti-civilization. An enemy force that adapts but never changes its nature.
Listen to those who experienced it firsthand. Ignore them at our peril.
{ChatGPT refused to help edit this text in its current form – instead it suggested a "more balanced approach — to criticize specific ideas, movements, historical regimes, or political tendencies while avoiding blanket condemnations" – and that is how the thing lives on…}
I don't believe the string theory is the right approach, but can't prove it, this is only a hunch. One insight is my understanding that a topological/geometrical construct is the wrong way. A better approach is operator algebra, for example Clifford Algebra Cl3,0(R) which uses no preconceived assumption on the number of dimensions or the nature of time-space. The specific model of time-space and transformation rules ought to come from the operator model, not be inserted as a given.
A second hunch that something is badly off with the String Theory are the way it models "graviton" which is a false physics since the underlying General Relativity Theory is false. That is because it is incompatible with the Quantum Mechanics due to its locality postulate and because it assumes the a priori existence of time-space, while ignoring the existence of spinor space.
Even if someone patched the General Relativity with the spinor space (by assuming the time-space model with complex coordinates, e.g. Dirac space) it would also not resolve the quantum non-locality contradiction. This again hints that the geometrical/topological models of physics simply lead in the wrong direction, away - not towards a better understanding of physics.
SMB
Wróbel: „Paryż płonie, bo grali w piłkę nożną”.
@LeszekMiller:„Paryż nie płonie, bo grali w piłkę nożną. Paryż płonie, bo wpuścili za dużo trzeciego świata i Paryż powoli sam staje się trzecim światem”.
‼️BOMBSHELL: French Biostatistician & 25-Year Pharma WHISTLEBLOWER Christine Cotton Comes Forward — Claims the Pfizer COVID Vaccine Given to the Public Was NEVER the One Tested in the Clinical Trials🤯
Christine Cotton — a biostatistician with 25 years of experience in clinical data management — posted what appears to be her final message before taking her own life.
She worked extensively on Pfizer’s COVID vaccine documents since December 2020. Her conclusion is devastating:
The vaccine that was rolled out to the public was not the same product used in the clinical trials that claimed 95% efficacy. According to her, the version people actually received had zero published data on either efficacy or safety.
She filed a formal complaint against health authorities. Shortly afterward, she was struck with severe, unexplained pain that ran from her lower back down her legs, along with burning skin sensations. She saw dozens of specialists, tried every treatment imaginable, and found no relief.
In her final message, she states she can no longer bear the pain and is ending her life. She asks for forgiveness and prayers for her soul.
Whether you agree with her conclusions or not, this is a serious allegation coming from someone with deep professional experience in vaccine data analysis — and she paid the ultimate price for speaking out.
Share this. Her final message deserves to be heard. 🔥
⚠️My channel is under coordinated attack to bankrupt and silence this investigation. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming DonateHere : 👉🔗https://t.co/CYZcYFYw91
THEO VON: “Was there anybody who was immune to COVID-19?”
DR. MCCULLOUGH: “There’s one adult group. You’re going to laugh.”
[Theo Von listens closely for the reveal]
DR. MCCULLOUGH: “Smokers… They got very mild cases. And they don’t get long COVID.”
THEO VON: “Why?”
MCCULLOUGH: “Because smokers maintain a level of nicotine in the bloodstream… Smoking blocks the spike protein. It’s amazing. I thought smokers were going to go down.”
THEO VON: “Do you think that’s a good idea [to use nicotine patches] on a regular basis?”
DR. MCCULLOUGH: “I think [it’s a good idea] if they have long COVID... Nicotine, don’t forget, is a nootropic. A nootropic is a drug that makes the brain function more effectively... It’s addictive, but it’s not harmful to the human body... Nicotine patches are perfectly safe.”
Pendant des siècles, nous avons vécu sous la tyrannie de ce qu'on appelle la loi de Brandolini : l'énergie nécessaire pour réfuter une absurdité est un ordre de grandeur supérieure à celle nécessaire pour la produire. C'est cette asymétrie qui a permis aux mauvaises idées de prospérer, parce que les démonter coûtait trop cher.
Very true! The hardest thing under the Soviet rule wasn't it's oppressiveness but all-permeating culture of lying!
The hideous nature of communism consists of turning some ordinary hard working good natured people like Russians used to be, into a society of lying psychopathis. It was done by inculcating the culture of denouncing and reporting on each other, and incouraging to claim wealth of other people.
It was not an organic grass-root movement but a system imposed through infiltration of some globalist occult group which stood behind the Bolsheviks, providing financing and the know-how of how to corrupt and destroy the society.
Jordan Peterson made a really important point:
The horrors of the Soviet Union didn’t just come from bad government. They happened because ordinary people were willing to lie, about almost everything.
He says the real cause wasn’t political. It was moral. Each person’s relationship to truth, their conscience, and their own soul.
We’re so quick to blame systems and leaders, but this hits deeper. The breakdown starts with individuals choosing comfort over honesty.
Once enough people accept small lies (even in the name of compassion), it opens the door to much darker places.
“We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, and still they continue to lie.” — Alexander Solzhenitsyn