Steve Rivard

If you know, you know.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@AdamMcCalvy Ya love to see it!

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@Woofkoof @KatMcKinley @christopherrufo You find that language here, under the "inadequate paraphrase" tab. https://t.co/zEYNIsdFSG

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@Jon_x5 I'm not sure you were paying attention. Biden and his administrative state were doing EVERYTHING in their power to strangle individual liberty.

You see benevolence in dictatorial usurpation of liberty by the executive, instead of tyranny. With folks like you, we're doomed.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@frifeifei For the same reason the rest of the world wants to come here, you ignoramus. No thanks to the likes of you "educated" losers that only bitch, but offer no tenable solutions.

And yeah, I know you've got 6 followers, but stupid is stupid. Thankfully, your PhD will aid your cope.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@BruinJustine @thevivafrei @davidleavitt Seriously. Who is this fucking Leavitt guy? Anyone? Bueller?

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@davidleavitt Correction: people with zero principle and inability to use logic are easily confused. It leads to inconsistent statements, which are hard to keep track of.

Here's the difference, you twat: what you've forgotten to say is that you favored vaccination under force of law.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@BarackObama "Care." 🤣🤣🤣

Imagine calling the extermination of life "care."

And yes, there are reasons for hope. Hope for the millions of children that would have otherwise been destroyed.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@PeterHotez @ScienceMagazine @hholdenthorp Scientists should be willing to debate anyone about scientific topics. If for no other reason than to show why an outrageous idea is, indeed, outrageous.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@Kelwattz7 @MrAndyNgo

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@msetty10 @MrAndyNgo I'll just put this right here.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@JackSpitz5 @MrAndyNgo Because there's one in Milwaukee.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@UpdatingOnRome @tmmoser Don't forget stunning. He's stunning AND brave. 🤡🤡🤡

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@LEDargin @MaryMacElveen @PDawgKnight @NBCNews @MattWalshBlog @elonmusk Well, those two degenerates used the cover of academia and science to hide their disgusting personal issues, so it seems rather appropriate to impeach their junk science with their own reprehensible proclivities.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@elonmusk @InezFeltscher @MattWalshBlog @JeremyDBoreing @realDailyWire Not fixed as of yet.....

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

There are no possible legitimate grounds for suppression of “What is a Woman?” by @MattWalshBlog. The movie contains no threats, no trick editing, and no hate speech — its satirical point is made using the statements of trans activists. If this can be suppressed, anything can.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

The twitter won't let me retweet the post I'd like to, so you'll have to just go to @realDailyWire to see the movie everyone should see. You might be surprised by how the film is actually produced versus what you've been told by the breathless media.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@JWB420 @ReliabilityComp @RNCResearch JW, you're missing the point.

Nobody is disputing that the debt is valid. But that debt service is part of the budget, or as you like to call it, the spending package. And since Congress comes up with the spending package, of course it's part of the negotiations. Duh.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@BitterTonic @spikedonline @historykev Not really. You're free to choose your own demise. You just don't get to involve anyone else. I'm not sure why that's controversial.

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@stclairashley

[Steve Rivard @structuralpe]

@BitterTonic @spikedonline @historykev Fine. Then you do it.

Involving others because you don't have the wherewithal or courage to do so is contemptible.