This is an important test.
David Grusch, Dylan Borland @TheDylanBorland, Jeffrey Nuccetelli @Ice_Alchemist11, and I are appealing directly to President Trump for release from our secrecy obligations.
The American people deserve the truth. They need the truth. And the truth is rightfully theirs.
But extreme secrecy has kept it from them, while unelected officials continue to obstruct the President’s effort to release information concerning UAP, NHI, and related matters.
So it is time to cut out the middleman.
If the bureaucracy will not carry out the President’s directive, then give us permission to do it ourselves.
In this video, we make that appeal directly to President Trump:
Release us from our NDAs and other secrecy obligations. Let us tell the American people what we know. Let America lead the way through disclosure, affirmation, and adaptation to the UAP reality.
Please share this. Make your voice heard. Tell the President: release the whistleblowers and let them speak.
🇺🇸 🦉
Mr. Mellon,
While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet...
You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples.
The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release.
This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs.
Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered.
So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?....
You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials."
https://t.co/Bnin6fajhK
This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics.
At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking.
Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data?
An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here:
https://t.co/gAD3Lv6R6V
Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?
@cbo305 The irony! I think when you've hit a certain age and have never given more than a few moments of your time to thinking about... topics of stigma (...or even space lol), you are unlikely to find room for it now. Especially as president.
Tim Taylor to Diana Pasulka: “They are going to become us through technology.”
Well, if that’s the case, then maybe we shouldn’t become too “technologed” (yes, as told to the Ariel School eyewitnesses).
@MinuteofZombie Very likely Mellon. Mellon was away on a family trip during that time. Davis seems to often unintentionally out people with very specific indirect info.
Could also not be Mellon, but cmon man lol
@MinuteofZombie What would they use for calibration standards?
Also... "I could've done this" as a debunk is interesting. Was his predecessor trying to determine the weight?
He died allegedly cutting into the "reactor"... I'd be hesitant to get a sample from the thing after hearing that.
@MinuteofZombie Might be in the same vein of: ufo 15 feet in front of you, take a picture! And then you don’t.
After thinking about:
Planning the dr visit,
rusing the medical staff,
getting cut open,
and it most likely being nothing.
You put it off for sure.
@10Forward2Back@BrianJo78940026 Thanks for the suggestion. I remember Jacobs reporting hybrids (hubrids) were caring and "fun". I guess determining if they're on the spectrum, even borderline, would be pretty difficult lol
I'll look up Karla Turner
@The_Astral_ How and where would you find other clinical psychiatrists findings on abduction experiences outside of literature?
These three wrote the literature, and frankly they’re all too similar.
But more importantly it comes down to whether a psychiatrist is open enough to publish…