بار الهی اگر برای هر مردمی سپاهی گذاشتهای، پس بدان که همین فرزندان بدخشان سپاهیان ما اند و بزرگانشان سپهسالاران ما. خدایا تیرشان را بران کن، عزم شان را مستحکم، قدومشان را ثابت و جنگ شان را کوبنده. تا باشد که خورشید خراسان طلوع کند و ملتمان روشنایی بقیه ملل عالم باشد.
امشب، شبی است که خشم فرزندان آزادیخواه میهن بر سر ظالمان فرود میآید.
سپاهیان میهن با ارادهای پولادین تقاص سالها ظلم و خفقان را پس میگیرند؛ هیچ نقطهای برای طالب امن نخواهد بود و شمارش معکوس برای سقوط نهاییشان به سرعت به پایان نزدیک میشود!
Introducing Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS): Recursive self-improvement through collective intelligence
Blog: https://t.co/LkQe5k7jOW
As AI systems tackle increasingly open-ended research problems, human experts may struggle to assess results and guide further progress. The model itself may be the best available optimizer and evaluator. The challenge is obtaining useful self-supervision within that homogeneous loop, where a model risks reinforcing its own blind spots rather than correcting them.
We ask whether a model can learn from the collective intelligence of its own team.
We introduce Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS). One shared model solves tasks through a team of virtual subagents, searches for better multi-agent workflows, then uses its own judgments to select the best ones.
Training on the best team’s executions provides self-supervision by distilling the team’s collective experience into the shared model.
We ran two cycles using a 27B open-weights model on synthetic open-ended research tasks. After the second cycle, score per output token reached 1.2-1.6x the base model's level across four research benchmarks.
Three key results:
First, MASS enables role generalization within an RSI loop: training only on task-solving data from the optimizee naturally improves the capabilities of both the optimizer and the evaluator.
Second, multi-agent trajectories are more efficient training data than single-agent trajectories for RSI.
Third, optimizer capacity, rather than evaluator capacity, can be the bottleneck in the speed of improvement.
We believe the community needs to investigate homogeneous RSI carefully to support AI safety. When a model is also its own evaluator, shared blind spots could allow mistakes to be accepted as progress and reinforced through training. For AI to improve beyond human expertise safely, we need to understand these failures and preserve effective ways to detect them and intervene.
Paper: https://t.co/SzXDlAzrUO
Code: https://t.co/xc870ZHRgh
This work was a collaboration with researchers at UC Berkeley.
In 2001 I said AI was ultimately the end of software and the OS. It got me laughed at.
Welp
“Creator of free Adobe clones unveils open-source Microsoft Office Excel, PowerPoint, and Word replications - Autodesk tools and other subscription-based services may come next”
Soon SI will just make what you need when you need it, save the code if you want and you can call it Excel or Word. Either way the old world is over.
You won’t believe what I am saying now.
Ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt:
"the belief is among some people in San Francisco that there will be an explosion in learning that will accelerate past what humans can understand"
Imagine a mathematical proof that's too complex for any human to understand, yet we can verify it's true
What does it mean if humans can never understand it?