@Real_JoJoQueer@BriscoJR8@Void246@gorilla_wrfre If the work is transformative and entirely unrecognizable why should they get credit? If I make an entirely new sentence by cutting a single word from 100 books each should I credit all of those 100 books? What if I copy-paste a single pixel from a million images to make new one?
@Void246@Real_JoJoQueer@gorilla_wrfre Nah I think you should still credit other people whose ideas you use, if it’s not transformative, it just shouldn’t be legally actionable for the most part.
@Nathan07516751@yallnornothing@arbyw888@dee_of_e "Small" has an implied lower bound, yet "arbitrarily small" is used all the time in math. Your arbitrary condition that "arbitrarily" can't be used when there is a lower bound is quite strange. Why are you so fixated and aggressive about this weird addition to the definition
@Nathan07516751@yallnornothing@arbyw888@dee_of_e Why does it matter if intelligence has a lower bound? “Arbitrarily small” is often used in the context of positive numbers, which has a lower bound: zero
@OSINTnode@thejonacosta@JKash000 Wow Trump has been in power for 6 years and has done nothing about the “uniparty”, or even mentioned it. He must be part of it
@Jean_Porneau@LookAtMyMeat1 I don’t think he was enraged/disgusted. The rabbi was getting to him because he was already thrown off about his affair getting out