@kingston_dad@worldviewdesign as opposed to the Jewish offshoot cult you're in? do us a favour and go and get educated first before casting silly jibes.
@worldviewdesign Let's move away from discussing your wife. I think there's a clear difference between being seen out in public and someone putting out a glamorised photo into the public sphere and in effect saying, look here at my wife. the 2 situations are disanalogous.
@hwmaqbul@hanafi_link @LuqmaanRashid_ @YasirQadhi without insurance? The fiqh doesn't even recognise limited liability and corporations as legal persons. Modern insurance defeats the risks of all our economic activity. Who'd risk any large commercial enterprise when they're personally liable for the attendant risks?
@hwmaqbul@hanafi_link @LuqmaanRashid_ @YasirQadhi ustaadh about the sunnah talaq and he said is talaq ever given except in anger. And that's just one example. In business, how can a global transportation economy be run without commercial insurance? Imagine an airplane crashes killing all passengers. Who pays any compensation/5
@hwmaqbul @LuqmaanRashid_ @hanafi_link@YasirQadhi What's at the heart of the matter is who is responsible for the evolution? If it's Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, then we're all good, but if it's Shaykh Doctor Yale then people like yourself say no no. So it's really a case of who has the authority to speak for Islam.
@hwmaqbul @LuqmaanRashid_ @hanafi_link@YasirQadhi yes, but these are the qawa'id fiqhiyya or the usual al fiqh, but the positive law, actually fiqh rulings, do evolve/alter/change with real changes in circumstances so that the ahkam enable justice and the purposes of the shariah. That can hardly be denied. /1
@grok @XPostComment @jesse1jesse@MuchNeededLogic@chrisbrunet you said it was genocide, then said it wasn't after being suspended and now you're saying it is. so describe the history of the reasoning behind each and explain the change