Pragmatic; I say things as they are; You know...Facts; Science; You're offended we don't share the same opinion...good, grow-up snowflake.
🚶🏾 Traveller
The human spirit is beautiful
A single man can change his entire clan’s destiny for the better with one promise to pursue excellence.
Become the hero of your bloodline.
Them trying to get rid of Jensen would be amongst the biggest blunders on their part.
Jensen is Nvidia, Jensen is AI & there's too much money riding on it to be ruined by such a scandal.
This Jensen Huang thing is so ugly. Guy takes a company from zero to absolute pinnacle, through blood, sweat, and tears, a pure founder’s founder, great products, makes so many people rich beyond their imaginations, champions open free local AI, and then the incumbent modern managerial safetyist human instrumentality establishment collectively decides they want to rip it all away from him because they think they can “do better”.
@HarrynatorA@WairimuMariam And those fortunate enough to ever experience it, will never ever try chase or do almost half of the things most men do to "win" the affection of a woman.
this was an intelligence operation
Jensen did not comply with what someone wanted
Jensen was positioning himself as a competitor / antagonist to the major AI labs + focused on open-source
this is not “dude just had an affair and company fires him”
this is a clear operation
Just so everybody gets a clear image about this.
If the board removes him as CEO, several clear boundaries apply:
• Every share Jensen Huang already owns outright is his legal property. He retains full voting rights for those shares and can hold them, borrow against them, or dump them on the open market whenever he chooses (subject only to standard SEC insider trading blackout windows if he remains on the board, or Rule 144 volume limits if he steps down completely).
• The only shares a board can claw back or cancel upon termination are unvested performance stock units (PSUs) or restricted stock units (RSUs) that have not yet met their time or performance milestones. Given that Jensen co-founded Nvidia in 1993 and holds roughly 3.5% of the company outright, the vast majority of his multi-billion-dollar stake is long since vested.
• Because he is Nvidia's largest individual shareholder, firing him against his will creates an immediate existential headache for the board. As an outside shareholder, he could launch a proxy fight to replace the board directors at the next annual meeting, start a rival silicon venture and poach Nvidia's top CUDA and architecture leads, or threaten to liquidate tens of billions of dollars in stock, cratering the share price for institutional investors.
In short, firing a founder who owns over $100 billion in vested stock does not strip him of power; it just turns him into an activist shareholder with infinite capital and zero fiduciary obligations to protect the board.
New technologies increase productivity, but you don't get a shorter work day. Lifespans increase, but the retirement age gets pushed back. Under capitalism, every advancement just leads to further exploitation.
@_RasJK@BoardLotSultan@sama Remember the cancel culture and the #metoo movement, it never died in its entirety.
Such is only observable in the west (gynocentric society) otherwise in Africa, South America, Eastern Europe, Asia, MiddleEast etc
This wouldn't be big news, let alone leading to resignation.
@BoardLotSultan@sama What people don't understand is that, when you have a superstar CEO, firing them often ends up worse for the company
> Apple with Jobs
> Sama OpenAi
> Jensen Nvidia
> Schultz Starbucks
Jensen isn't going anywhere, some people are just trying 2 arm twist him in those boardroom