@mcal321@billy_rothman@bfourthdownp Like, sure I guess, but it was only the most bogus kind of DPI due to a terrible throw by Lamar making Likely try and go back for the ball and 27 running into him.
And if 27 didn't touch Likely, he still wouldn't have had a play on the ball because it was such a terrible throw.
@blackholearmy_@BammisBurner@NathanJ04060931 I think Dolphins fans are quite right to want Allen cut, considering his career starts against them would be one of the greatest seasons ever
@GSwizzle2K22@J0n_12 The Chiefs defense did the majority of the work in 23-24 while the Bills defense hasd all the resistance of a wet paper bag. '23 the entire second level was injured and '24 the game turned when Benford went out.
Both years Allen scored more than any other AFC team all season.
@MattVerderame@AaronQuinn716 Fact does not disprove cherry-picking.
Cherry-picking is literally choosing which facts you want to use to support your argument while ignoring facts and context that detracts.
@EVBetsNY@LordWelshie "Best finale I've ever seen outside of Lost"
There's some serious cognitive dissonance going on in this sentence. The Lost finale was awful. Such a letdown.
@BuffRumblings "History suggests that many Super Bowl teams eventually lean on one pass rusher capable of winning obvious passing downs almost by himself."
Proceeds to list 6 guys, 4 of whom have never made a Super Bowl.
@Linkage4890@charliebilello A) 25 yo married couples are increasingly rare (and I was one)
B) 25 yo couples making 150k are even rarer (I wasn't)
C) 65 yo couples still working and making 150k aren't that common
D) The median household income is ~84k. Discussing the tax on double that is barely an issue.
@Linkage4890@charliebilello Oh, come on Jim. You know I was not seriously suggesting somebody have a child for tax benefits nor being insensitive to those who can't have kids (which was an absurd response to my clearly tongue-in-cheek comment)
The OP comparison is fairly irrelevant anyways.
@OrdinariateUSA@erpayo@TheCatholicEngr Membership is not a requirement to *attend* a Protestant church either.
Membership often grants voting rights in Protestant denominations. Hence the interview to ensure doctrinal alignment
@poyntilism@Airout12@TheCatholicEngr Membership often includes voting rights in the congregation and so the interview ensures doctrinal alignment.
A parishioner is more analogous to an attendee, not to a member. There aren't requirements to attend.
@PlexAlot@BritishCrums@america The Supreme Court case you are commenting on is about high school sports. If you aren't responding to that, your initial comment is completely irrelevant to the topic. (Not to mention false, as anyone going through male puberty will always have advantages in bone density, etc)
@PlexAlot@BritishCrums@america And how exactly is a high schooler on estrogen for a decade plus and getting all the surgeries? I've been told this doesn't happen...
@ArthurBoreman If you run an organization that say, preserves a park for public use. It has a board of members that make decisions for the upkeep of the park.
Are you going to allow a real estate developer who wants to bulldoze and build on the park to join the board? Of course not.