@TheShiaView@Hanbali2024 Your clueless,read what shaykh islam said in majmu' 👇🏼
also,ibn Taymiyyah was a conceptualist, and he also takes time to be a mental abstraction(the time he affirms for allah specifically),that is mind dependent, and under conceptualism, these universals R NOT CREATED. U Fool 🇮🇱
@ibnrajab01 And also, this in context that he was talking about the overwhelmed tajsim, and this is famous from asha3ira that they say fitrah affirms tajsīm.
And then qouted aristotle on adopting another fitrah, his transmission of aristus words become use less if he doesn't agree with him.
@ibnrajab01 Not only tht, Rāzī transmitted the following statement from Aristotle: "Whoever wishes to embark upon knowledge of divine matters must acquire another natural disposition for himself."
Then he explained it and agreed with it
@Blackbyil@saadalqadri Their scholars clearly said bukhari affirmed hawadith fi dhath Allāh which kufr + shirk according to these zanadiqah, but they will do every possible ta'wil to avoid takfir on such a big imām, while their tawil also doesn't make any inch of a sense. They just bunch of wafflers
Stop mixing us Sunnis with people who beat their chests and whose entire religion is built on abusing the Sahaba.
Don’t try to whitewash the bidah and deviations of the Shia by grouping them with us.
As for the so-called “Wahhabis,” they are from Ahlus-Sunnah. You, being a Shia yourself, keep throwing around the word “Wahhabi” purely to create division among Sunni Muslims.
The whole world now sees that you are a Rafidhi hiding behind a fake Sunni identity.
@saadalqadri See what your own maturidi scholar says about "shaykh al mujassimah" :
1. He used رضي الله عنه for a mujassim kāfir.
2. He says arabic lughah supports in him on the topic of muhdath and makhlūq,(while u guys say every muhdath is makhlūq by definition hahahah)