@elwinlamon@BizarroBabyface@texans945@ProDemocracyy@hashjenni Looks similar to the US-UK Mutual Defense Agreement (1958) but arguably the stakes are higher when it comes to surveillance and intelligence.
I'm not a fan by the way, of sharing intelligence, weapons tech and AI with a foreign nation.
Looks like a very bad idea.
@BizarroBabyface@texans945@ProDemocracyy@hashjenni I'll assume foreign bot or child.
American adults use their system of voting to support or discourage policies to try to effect change.
Children or foreign bots prefer to say silly things online as if that means something.
Have a peaceful day
Kindly,
I think you and I agree on the destruction of human beings being wrong.
What you and I probably agree on is no US funding or weapons sales to anyone anywhere outside of the US.
This is the responsibility of the Congress.
Not Erika Kirk
Not even the President
Congress.
Look up your Congress person (unless of course you are a foreign bot) and put your pressure there.
Silly comments about which US citizen is on which team is silly.
But I suspect you know this.
Israel has used American-supplied munitions to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians.
America is morally obligated to end support of Israel’s devastation of Gaza and its people. I’m cosponsoring the Block the Bombs Act to limit the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel.
@paramounttactcl I get that the behavior of the bullet is unusual but not impossible.
For those who say the bullet is impossible, they seem okay with a lot of impossible other alternative things.
Odd bullet-wealth of good supporting data points
Impossible bullet-no supporting data points
@BizarroBabyface@texans945@ProDemocracyy@hashjenni I can't speak for someone else.
I can say when people speaking are conflating issues and making understanding things difficult.
I realize you like "teams".
That makes your thinking very simplified.
Most things are not simple.
@Lunar_Readings I think they accommodated a person who has been continuously hostile toward them.
Not sure what could stop the hostility train.
It seems to have a life of its own.
That sounds like a fair place to start.
Charlie seemed to have a knack for knowing arguments can't always be won or lost but winning could also be gained with finding something good in common to build upon.
Some are unsatisfied with that and say if there is any taint, the baby must go out with the dirty bathwater.
From what I gather, there no effective organizations working today to counter some of the problematic ideologies that present themselves as a buffet at college campuses.
Charlie and TPUSA were effective in challenging the dialogue.
Do you think it better to add to the buffet or remove TPUSA altogether hoping something more appetizing comes along?