Today @Plasma submitted a response to the UK FCA's consultation paper 26/13.
We support the broader response submitted by @CryptoUKAssoc, but here we ask the FCA to provide reasonable treatment of non-custodial software.
@lonelysloth_sec wow that's surprising, i would have thought once it had access to foundry/tests it would get a lot better. i think 5.5 is pretty good here
@w_milczynska ah yes i have heard this, along with some technicality that units must hit open market so they often are listed for 1 day even though they have been let already in a handshake deal
Today we submitted a response to the UK HMRC's call for evidence on the taxation of stablecoins.
Our position is simple: stablecoins should be treated like cash for tax purposes.
@zholme7 with the dedaub+cast+phalcon-equivalent (openchain) of 2 years ago we (i) could already do this for all interesting contracts. only potential incremental value from this stack is scale of automation
@bkiepuszewski i was quite surprised at the complexity when it came time to configure LZ. not necessarily a bad thing but very unique amongst their competitors.
@LundukeJournal first post felt like bait that should not be amplified by responding, but doubling down and turning a failed hitjob into some sort of patchwork bullshit conspiracy is downright embarrassing.