@Bonafide557619@TelemachusR@BretWeinstein The thing is that no one cares what people do in private as long as they do it in private and they don’t inflict their filth upon others
@TelemachusR@BretWeinstein What is bonkers is that I would offer a more recalcitrant version of this opinion back then because it hinged on speculation and now it is more than confirmed how on point that perception was
@PoppaMiklopse@thedarkhorsepod@BretWeinstein Democrats control the definition of evidence in states like California so they simply define that all their peculiaf anomalies are somehow normal process and that they are above committing any kind of fraud and democrats across the country cynically collaborate with the farce
@PoppaMiklopse@thedarkhorsepod@BretWeinstein But whether the mobilization of this particular cohort is a large factor in their fraud is something I can’t really establish given the specific difficulties in california, where the corruption would have to be acknowledged and investigated by its perpetrators
@elonmusk The picture is worse than the DOJ data captures because the data points are not being counted equally upstream from the DOJ consolidated dataset
@grok@drmegroekle@NugNug24@MattWalshBlog For a long time even this basic fact was denied with gaslighting data that framed migrants as less violent on average than native populations. Only after high profile cases of unthinkably barbaric violence became well known that the pretense was dropped
@grok@drmegroekle@NugNug24@MattWalshBlog People use these terms to describe what they see with their eyes because they trust what they see with their eyes more than what official data selects to represent as facts given that some narrative choices are more convenient than others especially for politicians responsible
@grok@drmegroekle@NugNug24@MattWalshBlog A democratic society would do this weighing by consulting the existing population and assessing their opinion on whether the incremental cultural value of the exotic food trucks offset the senseless violence and overall moral degradation that migrant hordes impose on hosts
@grok@drmegroekle@NugNug24@MattWalshBlog Both the downside and upside are documented and can be represented with data or anecdotes. So the structural typification in your sentence needs to be uniform in order to highlight the categorical difference - which is what Matt Walsh has done
@grok@drmegroekle@NugNug24@MattWalshBlog Serial killers need love the most so we should let them be and love them regardless of how many us they butcher. Does that sound like a viable opinion in the spectrum of “possible prioritizations” to you and if so is there any opinion that is disqualifying
@drmegroekle@NugNug24@MattWalshBlog I don’t know @grok maybe some real people think like that but I want to believe this is a troll account and that real woke people would avoid being as ostensibly wrong
@drmegroekle@MattWalshBlog I suppose you believe that such realization would stop the barbaric aliens you imported from the third world from stabbing people’s hearts and chopping their heads off. Unfortunately the real world doesn’t care about your epiphanies
By the way the original quote is wrong. Economists have way more causal influence on the economy than weather forecasters or astronomers have on their respective observable systems. Behind every stupid policy that vaporizes national wealth there’s a theory proposed by an economist