vikram

[vikram @vikramh]

@CsTominaga @grok

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

Worse, BTC is risky and volatile.

So the supposed “store of value” behaves like a leveraged tech stock with religious marketing.

If returns are falling while volatility remains high, the risk-adjusted case gets worse, not better. You are taking massive drawdown risk for declining upside, while the underlying system still does not scale as digital cash.

That is not monetary evolution.

7tps never shall be.

[vikram @vikramh]

@hbgnostic Thank you!

[vikram @vikramh]

@LucianoDiNapol5 @SilverShield76 perhaps that rhetoric was the instruction from the objective analysis? what happens when the rug of lies gets pulled?

[vikram @vikramh]

@CsTominaga @QuintenFrancois 👀

[vikram @vikramh]

@SmokewitMenduza @SeunSign @Cristiano Its just amazing to witness all this genius talent playing at the same time . It's a symphony. Mutual respect amongst the greats is just right

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

The CIA CLASSIFIED a Soviet study in the 1950s showing that anti-parasitics DISRUPT CANCER GROWTH — and kept it BURIED for over HALF A CENTURY.

MILLIONS of cancer victims have paid the price as this vital line of research was set back by more than 60 YEARS.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

Just a note

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

It is not just disruption.

It is Orwellian. The point is not merely to attack a system that can scale, process, record, timestamp, and settle at industrial volume. The point is to seize control of the narrative around it before ordinary people understand what has been built.

If a system allows low-cost transactions, permanent records, auditable exchange, programmable enforcement, evidence trails, and commercial scaling outside their preferred gatekeepers, then it threatens more than a few business models. It threatens control.

So they rename things. They rewrite history. They invert language. They call scaling “centralisation,” utility “danger,” records “surveillance,” law “tyranny,” and property “monopoly.” Every word is bent until it serves power.

That is why the fight is not only technical. It is institutional. It is legal. It is economic. It is narrative control.

BSV continuing is the problem for them. It means the thing they tried to bury did not die.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

@cryptorebel_SV @Hekto100 Not yet

[vikram @vikramh]

@ruthheasman

[vikram @vikramh]

@Prolotario1 When you say Bitcoin you are actually referring to BTC, not Bitcoin.

[The Real Bitcoin @craigwrightai]

BTC vs. BSV

Source: @CsTominaga

[vikram @vikramh]

@Hekto100

[vikram @vikramh]

@cryptorebel_SV @ClearReason I prefer to think of it as destruction of the methodology of the cabal through open disclosure of all nefarious activities. Innocent people are innocent people.

[vikram @vikramh]

@ruthheasman Thank you

[🧬Maxpein🧬 @maximumpain333]

BRUTE STRENGTH VS INTERNAL POWER

In this demonstration from 5 Ancestors Fist, Master Yap Boh Heong explains how power is not created through brute strength.

Even when resisting with full body weight, force alone is not enough.

But with a small adjustment instance and alignment, the body connects and power is generated effortlessly.

This method, known as Luohan, shows how correct structure can produce powerful results without relying on strength.

[vikram @vikramh]

@genbashacho @strkewind Fascinating

[vikram @vikramh]

@leela0369 @CosmicShakti37 Yes correct absolutely ma'am 🙏

[vikram @vikramh]

@JoeConsorti BTC is not Bitcoin. Please do the research earnestly and inform your followers.