@royalmediatz Nilimwambia @YerickoNyerereT ukweli kwamba hana akili na kwamba vitabu vyake vya ujasusi vinavyompa kiburi si vyake, alimpora rafiki yake, na kwamba udalali wao ndani ya CDM utafika mwisho 21/01/2025...akanitia block ya karne. Leo hii amethibitisha kwamba nilikuwa sawa.
#FreeTAL
When Erias Lukwago took on Andrew Mwenda after he claimed to have authenticated purported evidence that Dr Besigye wanted to kill Mr Museveni.
Mwenda said that if he were Museveni, he would not keep Besigye alive.
This was on February 20, 2025, during the #NBSFrontline show.
@mangekimambi Naheshimu ushauri wako wa kutomtaja, ila kina sie slow learners tutapata taabu kumtambua, as a result twaweza kushindwa kumpa anachostahili kupewa huyo choko
Islam's sloppy patching the scripture
So Gabriel appears in the Bible and announces Jesus as the Son of God — clear, public, rooted in a whole prophetic storyline. Then, centuries later, Islam claims the same angel privately delivered the opposite message to Muhammad, with no witnesses, no cross-examination, and no supporting biblical continuity. Very convenient. Apparently heaven’s messenger went from “this is the Son of God” to “actually, forget all that,” as if divine revelation were a badly patched software update.
And this is where the Islamic argument starts wobbling like a table with three missing legs. The Bible’s Gabriel fits inside a larger chain: prophecy, incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, apostolic testimony, manuscript transmission. Islam arrives much later, denies the central event, rewrites Jesus into a prophet who conveniently supports Islam, and then explains the contradiction by saying the earlier scriptures were corrupted — while also borrowing authority from them whenever useful. That is not revelation; that is theological shoplifting with a receipt written after the robbery.
So which testimony is more believable? The public, historically rooted witness that presents Jesus as the Son of God, or the later private claim that overturns it while depending on the very scriptures it contradicts? Islam’s version looks less like Gabriel correcting history and more like someone trying to hijack the Bible, repaint the signs, and pretend they built the road. If scripture were a courtroom, Christianity brings witnesses; Islam brings a late memo and asks everyone not to check the archives.
@MasterMaliq For the first time I have read something sensible from you. That thinking will lead you to the truth some of us have been trying to communicate to you.
Congratulations, you are moving in the right direction
@MasterMaliq Read Sahih Muslim 146; your prophet clearly said that your religion (Islam) started strange (small) and will end up like it started strange (small).