कितना भयानक नज़ारा है यह!
RSS-BJP कितनी चालाकी और धूर्तता से काम कर रही है?
सिर्फ़ इतना ही नहीं कि संघी गुंडे बिना नेमप्लेट के पुलिस की वर्दी पहनकर प्रदर्शनकारियों पर बर्बरता कर रहे हैं, बल्कि उनमें से कुछ ऐसे कपड़े भी पहन रहे हैं, जिन्हें ख़ास तौर पर ‘मुस्लिम पहचान’ से जोड़कर देखा जाता है, ताकि पूरे आंदोलन को सांप्रदायिक रंग दिया जा सके।
वही ‘सनातनी मुसलमान’ हिंदू रक्षा दल के गुंडों का समर्थन करते हुए भी देखा गया, जब वे प्रदर्शनकारियों पर हमला कर रहे थे। उसने गुंडों और लाठियों से भरी गाड़ी को भी आड़ दी — वह मुसलमान नहीं है।
भारत के लोगों को इस पैटर्न को समझना होगा: RSS-BJP और उनके सहयोगियों द्वारा बार-बार मुसलमानों को बलि का बकरा बनाया गया है, जबकि असल राजनीतिक मक़सद हिंदुओं के वोट, जनादेश और उनकी चुनी हुई सरकारों को चुराना है।
RSS-BJP का मक़सद सांप्रदायिक विभाजन पैदा करना और उसका इस्तेमाल करके राजनीतिक सत्ता हासिल करना है।
मनोवैज्ञानिक रूप से सत्यापित बात है जो @IAmNehaBhart बता रही हैं: ज्यादातर पुलिसवाले कुंठित सैडिस्ट गुलाम हैं।
दूसरों को खुश, मुस्कुराते हुए, आवाज़ उठाते हुए देखते हैं तो भड़क जाते हैं।
इसलिए और ज्यादा ताक़त और रंजिश के साथ मारते पीटते और असॉल्ट करते हैं।
Pradesh 24 Gujarati. A Local News Telivision Channel from Gujarat invites VHP leader Jwalit Mehta to their News room, He is seen gifting Trishul to the Women telivision Anchors. The Women Anchors later make a throat-slitting gesture by holding the trishul. This video with a background music was shared by their own News Channel's Social media account.
The debate about ISRO privatisation , is more about how do we address ISRO's R&D transformation and also it's internal problems which is making scientists leave ISRO.
In the video ( the full video link is attached in the second tweet in the thread ), i address the ISRO privatisation issue as a whole.
(1/2)
Archives | A joint investigation by the German publication Süddeutsche Zeitung and the Venezuelan media outlet Armando Info has revealed that Vantara, owned by Anant Ambani, the youngest son of the Reliance chairperson, Mukesh Ambani, has received at least thirty-nine thousand wild animals from over thirty countries since 2022. Several of the imported animals in Vantara actually belong to species that are subject to an international trade ban, under the CITES. The report notes that Vantara has been under international scrutiny for bypassing restrictions under the CITES, possibly with cover from the Indian government.
Read @akhileshhpandey's cover story on how Modi's Project Cheetah is falling apart from our April 2025 issue:
https://t.co/0bbjfYM2ld
#Vantara #NarendraModi
@electricfoo Farmers aren't using complex web interface to figure out satellite overpass times! They were instructed by Govt. officials to shift timings so that fire count data could be gamed and they could show progress on paper.
https://t.co/7XbFkkhB86
https://t.co/woe7IWKbcz
Stage 2 triple negative breast cancer, likely brca positive, being treated with keynote 0522 protocol: carbo, pacli, keytruda. If anyone has personal experiences or qualified medical advice for the next year to help with chemo & immuno, please drop a note below and thank you. 🙏
Several BJP supporters are very hurt and are in deep shock seeing GenZ abusing BJP leaders..
You and many of your leaders have been abusing on social media for the past several years. Now you know where the GenZ learnt it from?
Statement : The blocking of BitChat's code on GitHub is unconstitutional and authoritarian.
New Delhi, 24 July 2026
The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) condemns the order issued by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), Ministry of Home Affairs, directing GitHub to remove the code repositories of BitChat.
The order, Notice No. 11072601011432, was issued at 11:16 pm on 23 July 2026 under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules, 2021. The order directs GitHub to disable access to three repositories, including the Android application and its release files, within three hours. It threatens the platform with loss of safe harbour and criminal prosecution. No copy was published by the Government of India. The public learnt of it from a post by @jack, whose team develops BitChat. Censorship in India now comes to light through disclosure by the censored.
Since 17 July 2026, the Ministry of Home Affairs has suspended mobile internet around Jantar Mantar as per public reports about five times, most recently within a 1.5 kilometre radius from 4 pm until midnight on 23 July. That radius takes in Janpath and parts of Connaught Place. Reports describe signal jammers at the protest site and people walking two kilometres before their phones work. Inside that zone a student separated from her group during a detention drive cannot send a message to say where she is. Thousands of students and young people have camped at Jantar Mantar since June, seeking accountability for examination irregularities. Permission for their march to Parliament was refused. Metro stations were shut and also internet connectivity has been blocked.
BitChat is an open source application built for exactly this situation. It passes messages from phone to phone over Bluetooth, without mobile networks or a central server. It is striking that the order does not identify a single unlawful message. It objects to what BitChat is. In its own words, the application is dangerous because it enables communication "even during network restrictions" and can "circumvent lawful restrictions" during "internet shutdowns". Hence, the government's objection is that citizens can speak to one another while it has switched the internet off.
The order is illegal on at least four grounds.
1. Section 79(3)(b) is not a blocking power. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court read down the provision. Intermediaries may be required to act only on a court order, or a government notification confined to the grounds under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Blocking is governed exclusively by Section 69A and the Blocking Rules, 2009, which require a hearing and reasons recorded in writing, subject to review. Directions issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal evade these safeguards, and constitutional challenges to this parallel regime are pending before High Courts.
2. The reasons in the order are circular. The order asserts that the repositories contain "information which is prohibited under any law" without naming any such information, and rests on what the application is "capable of" enabling. Anticipated misuse of a communications tool is not a lawful basis to prohibit the tool. By this logic a telephone exchange could be sealed.
3. The order cites Section 43 of the IT Act, a civil compensation provision, alongside conspiracy and abetment offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, against a platform that hosts code.
4. A three hour deadline issued close to midnight forecloses legal assessment and recourse, and fails the proportionality standard in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637.
The order also fails on its own terms as deleting a repository does not delete the application from any phone that carries it, and the mesh keeps functioning without servers. What the takedown actually prevents is scrutiny of the underlying code.
IFF demands that the Government of India:
1. Withdraw Notice No. 11072601011432 dated 23 July 2026 issued to GitHub.
2. Publish every takedown direction issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal, with the reasons recorded for each.
3. Restore full connectivity around Jantar Mantar, publish all suspension orders, and disclose the legal authority for the deployment of jammers.
We stand with the developers and the young protesters whose speech this order seeks to silence.