Bbbchat

[Bbbchat @Bbbchat3]

@kkrr83047808 @yuyimei2 乐
谁阻止你坡县印度化了

你坡县越印度化越好🤣🤣🤣

[庾一梅 @yuyimei2]

新加坡现任总统是印度人，他的老婆又是一个日本人，由此看来，未来的新加坡将是一个对中国非常不友好的国家。

​新加坡的印度人在全国人口占比已经达到了10%左右，印度人预计今后在新加坡现任总统的治理下，移民新加坡的印度人会越来越多，而且印度人还很能生，因此在不久的将来，新加坡大概率会将变成印加坡。

​新加坡的原总统李显龙曾经说过：“新加坡不是华人国家”，看来这句话真是要一语成谶了。

新加坡是一个印度国家！

[有了中国世界不再虚伪🇨🇳（互FO） @huaxin840866121]

新加坡街头印度人多得吓人😲

以前，华人约74%、马来裔13.5%、印度裔9%，由于移民政策调整，印度裔开始上升。

而在政府中，印度裔部长达到了40%，总统尚达曼、外长、内政部长、教育部长、交通部长等人都是印度裔。在公务员队伍中，也达到了35%，远高于人口占比。

再加上媒体跪舔阿三，新加坡未来可期

[战斗室 @7warroom]

亚利桑那州立大学（ASU）递交了诉状。
目标是一个 89 岁老人的家。

这老爷子在这栋房子里住了整整 50 年。
大学看上了这块地，要建个市区医疗园区。
开价 80 万美元，让老人自己拿钱搬走。
老爷子算得很清楚：这点钱去别处买地、再把老房子整体平移过去，根本填不上窟窿。
他拒绝了。

如果是普通人交易，你不卖，我不买。
但大学直接让亚利桑那州董事会出面，向法院申请“强制征收权”（Eminent domain）。
你不签字，我就用公权力强征。

看看这栋要被强拆的房子是什么来头。
124 年历史，比亚利桑那州建州（1912年）的时间还要早。
1990 年就挂牌进了凤凰城历史建筑名录。
就为了盖个新大楼，他们打算直接推平它。

ASU 的官方声明写得冠冕堂皇。
他们宣称报价是“州认证估价师”给的，程序完全��规。
这事看得人火大。
当庞大的机构盯上普通老百姓的私产，他们根本不需要动粗。
他们只需要走通法院，就能掏出一套带钢印的合法抢劫文书。

[Look at my shining eyes @GothicOrnate]

我们只是宇宙更高级文明算法的一些数字序列而已?

[Jeremy Bernier @jeremybernier]

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions.

Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place.

The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin.

Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not.

Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese)

On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days.

One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads.

I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard.

Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general.

When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it.

I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this.

I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity.

I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc.

But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

[二爷Alex @Alex8282019]

大家可以回望一下我去年的预言。这一轮美国绿卡政策变动，直接升级为地狱难度，华川粉不知道有多少被锤到，但恐怕已经叫不出来了。

[BLAIRE WHITE @BlaireWhite]

Holy shit why is this man on Fox News wearing a literal CIA mask

[Bbbchat @Bbbchat3]

@MuscleNips alpha sub is the hottest

[陳威廉 @williamlab]

这两天打开抖音，刷十条视频八条是这类型的，这个“摩洛哥新娘”算是彻底引爆结婚这个话题了。

得了，结婚率应该是没救了哈哈哈，真没想到现在互联网情绪成这样了。

真是大开眼界了，版本迭代速度太快了。

[邓聿文 @dyw1968316]

据金灿荣披露，中国移民局官员告诉他，中国现在是净移民国，每年流入中国的移民50多万，主要来自东南亚，南亚和东欧等国。

[伊利丹 @YLDLZN]

从ins上随便盗一个老外的图，然后开vpn把ip瞬移到美国，去小红书上发个动态，���将会看到马桶自动开盖。

[Bbbchat @Bbbchat3]

@YourSubBoi How sweet

[Election Time @ElectionTime_]

🚨SHOCK POLL: Democrats lead by a whopping 8% in the Texas US Senate election.

Texas - 2026 US Senate
🟦James Talarico 42% (+8)
🟥Ken Paxton 34%

YouGov | April 10-20, 2026 | 1,200 RV

[Bbbchat @Bbbchat3]

@YourSubBoi Ernest Duraković

[Bbbchat @Bbbchat3]

@whiteTony99 这是我见过最无能狂怒的外宣了
印尼这种屠华排华的国家
还一大堆国企过去投资，扶植当地产业链
这会无能狂怒了，发出来打脸，指望有谁来共情你？

[Bbbchat @Bbbchat3]

@MuscleService Who is this

[苏里格 @szslg]

这个对比太犀利了。
马斯克在中国的生意一点不比黄仁勋少-上海超级工厂、中国是Tesla最大市场之一、跟中国政府关系极好。但从来没人追着马斯克问"你到底是站美国还是站中国?"没人怀疑他的"忠诚度"。
而黄仁勋呢，一个在美国出生长大、公司注册在加州、雇佣大量美国人、交美国税的人，却要在一个podcast里被反复拷问"给中国卖芯片是不是在帮敌人"。而且Dwarkesh的问题设置就是一-你先回答"你觉得你算不算美国人"，然后我再用这个答案来堵你。
你说的本质是对的:这不完全是商业逻辑之争，这是身份政治。黄仁勋不管怎么用"美国技术领导力"来包装自己，在很多美国人(包括Dwarkesh这种聪明人)的潜意识里，他的"美国性"是需要被验证的、是可以被质疑的。而马斯克不需要接受这个测试。
黄仁勋其实很明白这一点。你看他整个采访的姿态--他在每一个技术问题上都自信碾压，但到了中美问题上，他的策略不是"我是美国人所以我说了算"，而是"让我们用商业逻辑来谈"。因为他知道，如果他用身份来主张立场，对方的潜台词就是"你的身份本身就是个问题"。
所以你观察到的这个"隐性政治表态"的被迫性，其实就是美国华裔(甚至亚裔)精英的天花板-你可以做到全世界最值钱公司的CEO，但你的"忠诚"永远是被审视的。马斯克可以公开骂美国政府跟中国做生意、收购Twitter推翻整个舆论场，没人问他的忠诚。黄仁勋只是说"我们应该在中国市场保持竞争力"，就已经需要在podcast上接受一个小时的盘问了。
这个差距，比任何技术护城河都深。