Samurai Jack

In pursuit of knowlege and learning. BleedGreen: P+🇵🇰

[Mushahid Hussain Sayed @Mushahid]

Seeing this 52-minute documentary leaves little doubt that @DeutscheWelle has done such a crude, intellectually dishonest, hatchet job of raising alarm about Pakistan’s nuclear program by questioning its legitimacy & safety, recycling old propaganda to link it to religious extremism! For example, the documentary starts off with the laughable proposition that Pakistan ‘illegally developed’ The Bomb, as if there’s a legal path to acquiring nuclear weapons, which Germany’s friends like India & Israel may have pursued! Then this documentary goes on to say the Pakistan Government ‘officially revealed’ the Bomb via the nuclear tests in 1998, WITHOUT MENTIONING that Pakistan’s tests were in response to the nuclear tests of India, also the architect of nuclearisation of South Asia, a fact that Deutsche Welle conveniently overlooks in its quest to demonise Pakistan! Given these low standards of professionalism of Germany’s ‘state-funded international broadcasting network’, it is perhaps no accident that Germany’s own international standing has fallen, since Germany suffered a humiliating defeat in elections to the UN Security Council in June 2026, losing to Austria & Portugal. Ironically, this defeat at the UN coincided with the first anniversary of German Chancellor Merzl’s shocking acclaim of Israeli aggression against Iran in June 2025, when he said ‘Israel is doing our dirty work’ & ‘rules of international law do not apply to Iran’!

[Zahir Kazmi @ArmsConAdvisor]

Here is what DW’s 52-minute hatchet job and @realZalmayMK years old anti Pakistan 🇵🇰 itch
will not tell you:

🇵🇰 did not nuclearise South Asia, 🇮🇳 Bharat did in 1974, misusing foreign-supplied nuclear assistance. Pakistan’s deterrent was an unavoidable response, not an adventure.

Pakistan’s nuclear ☢️ assets have remained secure under a robust command-and-control system, while recurring theft and trafficking of radioactive material in India are quietly ignored.

Pakistan did not create the Kashmir dispute; it remains unresolved under international law. Nor did Pakistan initiate the 2025 conflict. India used a false flag operation to launch an aggression Pakistan and get a bloody nose again. Pakistan responded with restraint and resolve, restored deterrence and accepted Indian request through mediators for the ceasefire.

And Pakistan is not a sponsor of terrorism. It is among terrorism’s greatest victims: more than 80,000 lives sacrificed and enormous economic losses sustained while dismantling Indian sponsored terrorist networks with its own blood.

Pakistan was won through extraordinary sacrifice and has been defended through extraordinary sacrifice. We neither need DW’s certificate nor fear its propaganda.

Criticise Pakistan by all means but bring facts, context and equal standards. Otherwise, call it what it is: a crude propaganda film masquerading as journalism.

Shame on them.

https://t.co/JAVvIava0F via @YouTube @dwnews

[Rabia Akhtar @Rabs_AA]

If you wanted attention, DW, all you had to do was ask!

In this pathetic documentary, the conclusion came first. Pakistan was then edited to fit it. The method is embarrassingly transparent:
1. Show a radical cleric.
2. Cut to a nuclear facility.
3. Add ominous music.
4. Mention instability.
5. Let insinuation replace evidence.

Pakistan is described as having “illegally developed” nuclear weapons. Illegally under which law? Pakistan was never a party to the NPT and therefore did not violate an NPT obligation by acquiring nuclear weapons. DW may disapprove of the program, but moral disapproval is not a legal argument, Folks.

Notice the asymmetry in language! India developed nuclear weapons. Pakistan “deceived the world.” India’s programme is treated as a strategic fact. Pakistan’s is narrated as criminal cunning. Mashallah!

The documentary briefly mentions 1971, India’s conventional advantage and Pakistan’s loss of faith in external guarantees but refuses to let any of that seriously explain Pakistan’s nuclear choices. Context is included only so it can be ignored.

Then comes the old “Islamists might seize the bomb” trope. No evidence of penetration of nuclear command structures is presented. No demonstrated breach is identified. No serious institutional assessment is offered.

Just militants somewhere in Pakistan and therefore loose nukes.

Even DW’s own interviewees acknowledge centralized command and control, multiple security layers and specialized forces protecting nuclear assets. But every reassuring fact is treated as an inconvenient interruption before the awful soundtrack returns to impending catastrophe.

DW uses AQ Khan's case as a permanent substitute for analysing Pakistan’s present nuclear-security architecture. History becomes guilt without expiry, who knew!

But that's not all! of course, there comes Kashmir, which is handled with similar intellectual laziness. Instead of seriously examining disputed sovereignty, war, repression, failed diplomacy and competing legal claims, Pakistan’s position is reduced to a psychological obsession arising from its Muslim identity.

A retired brigadier making expansive comments about nuclear use is presented as a window into Pakistan’s doctrine.

He is not the National Command Authority.
He is not the Strategic Plans Division.
He is not an official doctrinal document.
But guess what! nuance would spoil the drama.

The documentary also bundles together military businesses, hospitals, gated housing, blasphemy laws, Imran Khan, Afghan refugees, illegal weapons markets and attacks on Christians.

These are serious issues. BUT they are not evidence that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is insecure.

Here's the central fraud: collapsing four separate questions into one.

-Pakistan’s democratic governance.
-Its civil-military imbalance.
-Its internal security challenges.
-Its nuclear command and control.
DW treats them as interchangeable because differentiation would require actual analysis.

The final product is the standard Western Pakistan story:
-Too poor to govern itself.
-Too religious to be trusted.
-Too militarized to be democratic.
-Too unstable to possess nuclear weapons.

Pakistan has serious problems. None of them should be denied or romanticized. But a credible documentary would distinguish between nuclear safety, nuclear security, political stability and democratic governance. It would examine institutions, procedures, doctrine and evidence. It would compare Pakistan with other nuclear powers. It would ask whether the risks it highlights are demonstrated, plausible or merely imagined.

Strip away the ominous soundtrack and all that remains is a tired collection of stereotypes. The only real danger in this documentary is losing sixty minutes you will never get back.

[Samurai Jack @Cercatore8691]

https://t.co/uC6xhew6vk

#Pakistan

[Samurai Jack @Cercatore8691]

@Nermeenalswaisi @wasalive22 @UNHumanRights @UNRWA
When will your humanity rise from its slumber

[Nermeen from Gaza 𓂆🇵🇸🍉 @Nermeenalswaisi]

We’re not beggars — we’ve been forced into hunger, homelessness, and hopelessness.

If you care, donate ... or leave a dot.

https://t.co/2joFUxl0rv

[Rabia Akhtar @Rabs_AA]

For too long, conversations around strategy, deterrence, and security have stayed within expert circles. But these issues shape all of us and they deserve to be understood more widely.

This post explains what I’m trying to do with the channel @mindovermic11 and why clarity in these conversations matters.
https://t.co/niQhHxToTP

[Emelia @Astridueil]

In his novel *Netochka Nezvanova*,
Dostoevsky writes:

— "Such is life; in the future, you will encounter other cruel people... Envy will stifle you, and the baseness and folly of others will suffocate you far more than poverty ever could."

[Conflict @ConflictTR]

🔴 Gazze'de çocuk olmak..

[amsha @ohhyesweirdo]

My brain can’t comprehend how a monkey and a penguin get more attention than an actual human baby, starving in the middle of a genocide. People in Gaza deserve to live too. No child deserves to be starved to death or shot in the head.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Written in 2014. But still applicable today.

[A.Y.O @YusufAsunmogejo]

Dear Zuha,

I know you are inquisitive about how our religious days fit into the modern world. It is a brilliant question. I will be breaking this down for you so you can clearly see that Islam is not a copycat. It is a complete system with its own deep, independent roots.

Firstly, you asked: if the Gregorian calendar is not real, why do Muslims pray on Friday, and is there a different Friday in the Islamic calendar?

To help you and others understand, we have to go back to history.

Pope Gregory was the one who introduced the Gregorian calendar, and he introduced it in 1582. However, when you look at Islamic history, you will see that Muslims had been observing Jumu'ah for nearly a thousand years before that Pope was even born. If you open classical books of Islamic history such as the Seerah of Ibn Hisham or The Sealed Nectar, the physical proof is right there.

These books documented the very first Jumu'ah prayer held by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in 622 CE. It took place in the valley of Ranuna during his migration from Mecca to Medina. In that same era, Allah revealed an entire chapter in the Quran called Surah Al-Jumu'ah, where He commanded the believers to leave their worldly trades and gather. This proves Yawm al-Jumu'ah was a lived reality in the 7th century, over 900 years before the Gregorian calendar existed in Rome.

Now, you might wonder how this connects to the Friday we know today. Frankly, the seven day weekly loop is an entirely different system from how we count solar or lunar months. It is an ancient, unbroken mathematical cycle. You do not even have to take my word for it. Non Muslim historians and sociologists agree on this.

For instance, Eviatar Zerubavel in his book The Seven Day Circle confirmed that this weekly cycle has remained completely unbroken for thousands of years across different empires. The day the Western world decided to call Friday aligns seamlessly with the sixth day of that ancient cycle.

In Arabic, the days are just numbered. Sunday is Day One. Monday is Day Two. The sixth day is Yawm al-Jumu'ah, the Day of Gathering. This means we do not pray on this day to honor a Roman calendar. That is, it was just a coincidental relationship. We pray on it because Allah established it on a divine timeline.

Secondly, you asked: why is Friday night considered so blessed, and what are you missing here?

To understand this, we have to look at the foundations of human existence. Friday goes more than just the end of the work week. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) taught us that Friday is the day Prophet Adam (peace be upon him) was created, the day he entered Paradise, the day he was sent to earth, and the day the world will end.

This is why the Prophet had a very profound routine. Every Friday during the early morning Fajr prayer, he would recite Surah As-Sajdah and Surah Al-Insan. He did this deliberately. These two chapters detail the creation of the universe, the biological creation of man, and the intense realities of the Day of Judgment. Praying these chapters every Friday morning is a divine reset. It reminds you of your origin and your final destination, both of which are tied to this specific day.

Because Friday carries the heavy weight of the end of times, reciting Surah Al-Kahf is your spiritual shield. The Surah contains stories about the ultimate trials of wealth, power, and faith. Reading it provides a divine light that protects your heart from the materialistic noise of the world and the deception of the Dajjal until the next Jumu'ah.

So by this fact, you are not missing anything. You just need to see that we are not following a Gregorian Friday. We are following a divine timeline. Don’t fret.

Allah knows best.

[Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 @jacksonhinkle]

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING: Former CIA officer Josephine Gillio said"In Iran, 165 innocent little girls were killed by American Tomahawk missiles fired from destroyers."

"I can say this as a former officer, 'We Are The Terrorists'."

[ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸 @KAGdrogo]

@NachoQuixotic Admitted on record.

Israeli soldier testifies to Knesset committee:

“We received orders from the Golani Brigade commanders on October 7 to cancel all patrols along the Gaza border from 5:20 AM until 9:00 AM.'

[Samurai Jack @Cercatore8691]

@UNRWA @EU_Commission @ICJPalestine how long will you all stay silent and remain accomplice in this genocide?

[Niall Stanage @NiallStanage]

To be clear, this is an opinion column in a major Israeli newspaper advocating ethnic cleansing.

[Furkan Gözükara @FurkanGozukara]

Absolute bombshell. Former UK Minister Alan Duncan confirms there was a clear peace agreement mediated by Oman for ZERO nuclear proliferation in Iran. But it was sabotaged and betrayed by Israel because they always wanted to attack Iran. Israel started this war!

[Rabia Akhtar @Rabs_AA]

Ouch! One doesn’t accidentally arrive at such language, ladies and gentlemen. To reduce mediation to “dalali” suggests a familiarity with that frame perhaps because it is the only lens through which India understands statecraft. After all, you can only describe the world using the vocabulary you are most fluent in.

[Bryce M. Lipscomb @BryceMLipscomb]

As an American citizen, I wish we would leave the rest of the world alone.

Retreat to our own borders, close every overseas base, & just trade with the rest of the world 🌎.

We have caused enough damage & suffering. It’s time we sit in a timeout.

[Samurai Jack @Cercatore8691]

@MENAUnleashed What about Ukrainian attacks on Russian port?

[Rabia Akhtar @Rabs_AA]

This is exactly the kind of analytical discipline we need in moments of crisis. Source scrutiny, capability assessment, and timing all matter. Narratives travel faster than evidence so pause before accepting them.