CoupDeRighty

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@emptyblankspace @bronzeagemantis Is this another attempt to avoid “bad” facets of his thought? He really use biological terms to describe decadence, new aristocracy (and was feared by Darwinianism) and to express the hate to old one. “Soul” is a senseless notion, bastard of IE grammar. Stop reading Kaufmann

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@4liocha_ Abandon ancient philosophy if you don't know ancient Greek or Latin pretty well. You will just get engulfed in the conceptual mismatching that was created in the process of translation and comprehension through the lens of "common sense". Philosophy isn't a bunch of buzzwords

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@KirillMagidson The specific nature doesn't lie in consciousness. Kant rejects the clarity of our psychological world once and for all. You are limited not only by external reality, but by the very internal unconscious world too. This is the way by which Kant swept skepticism away

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@emptyblankspace @bronzeagemantis You don’t read “Will to power” obviously. There, he is concerned by the fact that survival prefer the “moderates” (i.e. he understood Darwinianism) There isn’t “methaphor” in his philosophy. He is the peak and the final of western thought. Absolute technicism and biologism

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@howlinghowler_ @Tom_Rowsell Georgians are genetically a far more close to Baghdad than to the whites

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@seledka_vodka Where is that “culture” stemming if it isn’t a part of biology? From God?

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@MattLutzPhi Sooo is there the unnatural substance that is constitutive for moral? You’ve just recreated the non-physicalism lol

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@p8stie Sieyès (a major voice among the early revolutionary deputies) didn’t write against the Franks. He actually debunked the legal distinction between the estates thorough historical arguments. “There are no pure Franks anymore” — that’s pretty much what he thought

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@mikitaposts The communism would have let to the same situation if it had had more the complex economies such as West Germany and France. Stalinism is just another form of technicist western modern society. The pure (&evil or good) capitalism is a forgotten dream of the XIX century

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@AptemTemka @moecus Следствие биологии это биология. Буду считать, что такая агр��ссивная реакция после сообщений «мы другие в отличие от мартых» это признание неправоты

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@AptemTemka @moecus @No_Horns Так-так, а каким образом социальное является отдельной субста��цией от «биологии»? Вы верующий? Или дюркгеймианец?
Еще раз - строгая моногамия, зачатки полового равенства и те самые «социальное вне биологии» это клочок земли на западе Евразии в последние 500-700 лет

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@AptemTemka @moecus @No_Horns Ты исповедные книги любого региона Европы глянь и увидишь какой там "институт семьи" был. Массовая недвуличная моногамия это европейский город после 1550 года

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@ExSouUsU @UBERSOY1 By the same logic you can assert the continuity of the Flavius…

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@dadapweasegrayp @EdwardEGibbon Thus, the average elite man in the West was a 140+ IQ turbo-progressive dude like Harry White (there is some irony). And the USSR was ruled by 120 IQ technocrats like Brezhnev. Marxian ideology was abandoned as true intellectual core of the Party, which it should have supported

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@dadapweasegrayp @real_steelrain @EdwardEGibbon The pre-1954 USSR educational system had a gender split within the learning process; it was built on the modern values that had started to fade away in the Western world. The average WASP was much more left-wing than the average Russian, if we are being honest

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@dadapweasegrayp @real_steelrain @EdwardEGibbon It was literally

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@Marl_Gravel @hyperphonk Because you said I guess

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@sevenwheeldrive @JulianHeliosII @zelinarxy well, it would be nice if you shared your point of view on this. good night

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@sevenwheeldrive @JulianHeliosII @zelinarxy Ok, let’s assume such genealogical roots really exist. But we mustn’t dismiss any hypotheses about the different properties of languages (internal or external) as “pseudoscience” or a “far-right theory”. An assumption of the essential “equality” is far more anti-scientific

[CoupDeRighty @Coup_de_Righty]

@sevenwheeldrive @JulianHeliosII @zelinarxy Sooo, there isn’t any univocal (logical, structural, cognitive, genetic and so on; it’s not worth discussing now) foundation for all languages in the same way as languages don’t have universal audio-properties?