@phprunner I can run it in the newer versions but security in new access is a pain and the newer office menu ribbon icon is a lot more cluttered than the old 2003 simple menu tree lists - plus install of new versions on cheap old laptops is terrible.
@phprunner MS Access 2003 - built an application for timing athletic races - and I have an unlocked install disk. I have since redesigned the system in phprunner but when timing races I use it as a back up system that runs locally in case when I get to a venue internet is not available.!
@phprunner and like the old versions of those products and exceptionally for a low code tool, with PHPrunner, you buy the tool build unlimited products, own those products and run them wherever you want. Its not just the tool that is exceptionally good so is the pricing model.
@dhh I should add when we can create immortal tools we will have all the wealth of not just what we can create but what everyone before us has created. I find that inspiring
@dhh Great article @dhh totally agree with the principal drive towards immortal application platform development this is and always will be the underlying value of digital. Cannot understand why so many platforms drop support for the old for the new regularly.
@chrisman I should add ... so LLMs won't be the end of traditional deterministic software in fact there will be more than ever but they will be a massive shift in how that software is made
@chrisman Non determinism is great for research and coding. So getting LLMs to write deterministic system is a good win. If they can get to the point were they can write bullet proof deterministic systems that would be big
@surinder_saroya@DeborahMeaden Maybe but have you any idea how much it would cost to duplicate every single govt department. There was a reason why enlightenment happened after unification in Scotland there was immediate benefit from unified market