Whether you are new to NRG, transitioning into a new role, or taking on different clinical trials, the NRG Mentorship Program offers personalized support from experienced NRG members. Learn more ➡️https://t.co/NvxY7ax0fS
@rweichselbaum@ilyassahinMD@JCO_ASCO The CTC data suggests just that . Please support the next generation of trials using response based (Swog s2511) or molecular selection (NRG Clarity) .
@Icro_Meattini@JAMouabbi@DavidKrugMD@Docace911 CTCs interact with the arms - prompts the hypothesis that ablation is beneficial if micrometatstatic systemic disease is controlled. New concept being evaluated at NCI next month. 🤞🏻🤞🏻
@TonyFelefly@5_utr The stratifications were done based on the assumption (which everyone assumed ) PFS would be better in ablation and the remaining 289 would accrue. Our prediction for PFS in the sbrt was spot on. Systemic only with oligo did very well. The forest plot was done as exploratory.
@UCCancerCenter@JCO_ASCO@UChicagoMed@UChicagoBreast This statement is confusing. The trial as designed shows no benefit in PFS between treatment arms. The secondary endpoint shows selection with low or absent Ctc with ablation had a benefit . This is driving the next generation of trials . Thank you to all my UC collaborators!
@TonyFelefly@DavidKrugMD Yes No and yes 🤣The primary also had to be controlled, 1/4 de novo. 60% single Met. The CTC plus imaging PFS finding in the SBRT lead be Dr Woodward @IBCradiation is really exciting and will lead to the next trial run by Dr Goodman @ChelainG
@5_utr@TonyFelefly@DavidKrugMD BR002 is a specific question in breast cancer. The CTC results suggest the next generation of trials must to incorporate molecular and imaging data or response adapted (Swog s2511). SABR-comet was a different trial with few breast cancers.