I heard there is a poll going on between “Thanos” and I on who would win in a singles match……“Thanos” obtained 6 stupid little infinity stones…..but I won a Gold Medal with a broken freakin neck, how many Gold Medals has Thanos won? ZERO! Hit my music 3 times and it’s game on. YEAH!!!!!!!!
@nucIearangel Total wine’s got too much of an ego, several times I’ve gone in there and they wouldn’t let me buy anything cause according to them, I’m “freshly 21”
Sony’s lawyers are arguing that it should already be obvious that PlayStation digital games aren’t actually owned by the people who buy them.
In the lawsuit, Sony points to its Software Product Licensing Agreement, which says: “The Software is licensed to you, not sold.”
Sony also makes a more unusual argument: if a customer actually owned a digital game, another person wouldn’t be able to buy the same copy.
They use Resident Evil Requiem as an example. One customer bought the game on February 14, 2026, and another bought it on February 25 for $69.99.
Sony’s argument is basically: if the first customer actually owned the digital game, how could Sony sell the same game to someone else
Seems like some performative bullshit, cause wdym he joined after they made the Zombie cover without Dolores and is only now leaving cause they wanna tribute again? Genuinely gtfo bro, stop being performative and grow a damn spine.
AJ Rebollo has stepped down from Bad Wolves stating he cannot "cosign the decisions constantly being made for this band by the label."
He cites most recently the label's decision to move forward with the band's cover of Dolly Parton's Jolene in spite of band member opposition, as the song was originally meant to feature Dolly and members feel releasing it this week would come off appearing as "a capatilization on her passing."
A federal appeals court ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using AI — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
The court relied on Supreme Court precedents Stanley v. Georgia (1969), which established protections for the private possession of obscene material in the home, and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002), which ruled that certain virtual depictions involving no real children are protected by the First Amendment.
The defendant in the case, Steven Anderegg, was charged with producing and distributing obscene AI-generated images and sending them to a minor over Instagram. The possession charge was dismissed under the Supreme Court precedents.
The judge panel in the case has asked the Supreme Court to “reconsider legal precedents that predate advances in AI.”
(https://t.co/dB9uM8NG4c)