IntentGuard

DeFi transaction outcome enforcement layer.
The first module of the Firewall Layer for Ethereum.

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

@safe Self-custody just got a little more zen 🧘

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

Bringing more peace of mind to self-custody.

[Safe.eth @safe]

🔊 Introducing Safenet Aegis: the first production-ready and fee-generating release of Safenet, secured by $SAFE.

Safenet is a decentralized security protocol for self-custody.

💲 A user submits a transaction to Safenet for a small fee.

👓 Sentinels @OpenCover, @BlockSecTeam, @candidelabs, and @IntentGuard check every transaction and are accountable for their verdicts.

✅ Validators @gnosis_, @greenfield_cap, @SafeLabs_, and Core Contributors attest the verdict onchain.

💂 A formally verified Safenet Guard can enforce the attestation, back on the user @safe , defending against threats.

Safenet is live on @ethereum @arbitrum and @gnosischain and is coming soon to @SafeLabs_ multisigs.

📄 Read more: https://t.co/6Ny8GiOWU8
🌐 Website: https://t.co/Ci2XJxnp13

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

Safenet is building the future of onchain security through a decentralized network of Sentinels!

We’re excited to be part of the Safenet Aegis proposal as one of the proposed independent Sentinels helping protect the Safe ecosystem.

Decentralizing security removes the dependency on any single provider or detection system, creating a more resilient security layer as onchain threats continue to evolve.

Looking forward to continue contributing as the proposal moves through Safe{DAO}. 🛡️

[Safe.eth @safe]

🗳️ New Proposal for Safenet Aegis is now live on the Safe{DAO} forum. Here is a breakdown ↓

It asks to fund the first production-ready protocol version built to secure @safe Multisig and the wider ecosystem in Q4.

Threats to self-custody are only increasing, and most defences today are still just warnings, not enforcement. Safenet Aegis is changing that paradigm.

🔰 Safenet is a decentralized network of independent Sentinels and Validators
📜 Sentinels check every transaction against a public, DAO-owned charter using their own proprietary threat detection systems
🧾 Sentinels pass verdicts. Verdicts are attested by validators onchain making security enforceable
🛡️ Enforcement happens at the account level via Safenet Guards

Proposed Independent Sentinels checking transactions: @OpenCover, @IntentGuard , @hackenclub, @hexens, @BlockSecTeam and @candidelabs

Proposed Validators: @gnosisdao, Core Contributors, @greenfield_cap, @SafeLabs_, @RockawayX and @bcap

Safe{DAO} through this proposal, owns every fee parameter on the Safenet protocol. Safenet Aegis will ship inside @SafeLabs_ multisigs in Q4 2026.

Read More ↓

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

@A_Leutenegger Btw, we just released some of our enforcement contracts!

https://t.co/6KbQ9E2w3V

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

Exactly. A blockchain transaction authorizes code execution, but it does not guarantee execution quality.

The missing layer is enforcement: making sure the final state change matches the user’s intended outcome and nothing else.

This is the execution control layer we are building.

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

the problem with bridge UX, and DeFi UX in general, is not only broken interfaces.

users are forced to set wider slippage than they actually want, because tighter constraints make the transaction more likely to revert.

so users leave room for market changes. and too often, execution lands near the lower bound.

that is bad UX.

IntentGuard is building toward a user-centric future for DeFi: users define the outcome they want, and the market works to satisfy it, not the other way around.

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

@Pybast That’s our hunch! We’ll share the findings in the next report.

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

Is what you see really what you get in DeFi?

We analyzed large (> $ 50k) Uniswap V3 swaps to measure the gap between the price preview shown before signing and the price users actually received.

TL;DR:

- 78.3% of default-tolerance swaps settled within 1% of the signed slippage floor, and 84.1% within 5%

- Favorable outcomes were economically tiny: max +3 bps, while adverse execution reached ~50 bps in common default-tolerance cases

- Only ~4.2% crossed the slippage floor and reverted. 78.3% settled just inside it.

Read the report, link in the comment.

@ethereumfndn
@Uniswap
#DeFi

[IntentGuard @IntentGuard]

Report: https://t.co/KS7NPeFsZZ