Ivan Cartago

I love basketball, puns, and science.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@michelletomkim @musingsusa @techreview I don't think it's that big a deal. An $8B company is a mature company already and already has something good. That's why they're worth $8B. It's not like buying something like pennies and boosting it's worth exponentially.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@michelletomkim @michelletomkim any updates on this one?

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@HMRCcustomers @HMRCgovuk A Company UTR. We are an overseas company registered in the US and we are selling on Amazon UK. We had a company name change which doesn't match the UK Registered VAT name anymore and we want to change that. I will message on FB.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@MrBigDoIt13 @ShamsCharania Who cares? Losers should not be rewarded for losing. So what if they're penalized. They're losers. It's a competition.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@claudeai Shit release. Bring back Extended Thinking!

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@8teAPi Absurd that they only came to the addiction conclusion later on. Engagement and the possibility of addiction was always there from the beginning.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@sherwinwu Keeps logging me out. Annoying bug.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@sama You have the morals of an ad company.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@Sheldon056 This isn’t Seedance 2.0. This video was months ago.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@thekidet Time spent on the craft. Most NBA players are bad at articulating the game to an audience. They were good at the game so they won't spend the hours required to be good. I doubt most NBA players spend time on thinking how to say what they think in a simple way to an audience.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@tsoding You mean a search engine? Like Google Search.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@chrisgpt The appointment has to happen though before the claim it actually scheduled the appointment. It could also be hallucinating.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@skalskip92 Great work. META now has SAM 3, maybe that will make this better!

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@daniel_mac8 @karpathy That's such a bad idea. It's too abstract of a method and how are they going to scale that up to lots of students.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@javilopen Magnific is the best upscaler on the market!

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@FADEDJAYZ You would know, you’ve done a hundred eye pokes in your career.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@8teAPi How the fuck is that not 0% at 2030. Lol.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@Radiolab Such a tearfully beautiful episode.

[Ivan Cartago @IvanCartago]

@burkov They say it's 196K but only when using ChatGPT-5 Thinking. https://t.co/su1ehfQ0eg

[Yann Dubois @yanndubs]

I saw a lot of people complaining about 32k context size in ChatGPT for plus users, which would be terrible for coding. But actually we are giving 196k context size for plus users when using GPT5 thinking and that’s the model you should use for coding use-cases!

32k is for the chat/non-reasoning model. If you have examples that require more than 32k for non-coding usecases please post them below.

Sorry, this wasn’t clear in the original release… :/