David Sacks says Anthropic has "corporate schizophrenia" and is hypocritical at every turn
“I think we know from our friends that the investors in Anthropic are pulling out their hair right now.”
“You have current leadership in the company saying that there's a greater than 10% chance of causing human extinction, and their own product is unsolved in this area. How do you IPO with your own management saying that?"
“Then you've got, I don't know what to call it except corporate schizophrenia. You've got Dario putting out this essay saying, we need to pace the frontier, days before they launch Claude 5.5 and set a new frontier."
"At a minimum, it's hypocritical, but maybe it's even worse than that."
"Then you have them publishing an essay about the bio risk associated with AI and how that needs to be stopped. Meanwhile, they announced a new bio lab in San Francisco.
Jason: "They started a lab after telling us that there's a 10% chance of us all dying. Is this a dereliction of duty as the chief executive officer of Anthropic to sabotage your own IPO?"
"If the four of us were on the board of Anthropic, we would replace the CEO, we would put the CEO in the lab, and we'd find a CEO who knows how to run the company and not sabotage it. He's literally sabotaging his own company."
Watched Primetime in theaters. Total embarrassment. Audience audibly turned on it. Lance Oppenheim is definitely a predator, should be blacklisted. Every pedophile was shown sympathetically. Chris Hanson is a 2D megalomaniac cartoon. Tries to make him look worse than pedophiles.
Off the top of my head:
- bizarre Indian mysticism plot about how mob justice is the real monster.
- rabbi pedophile has powerful aura that shocks Chris Hansen by asking him "who gave you the right"
- everything is dramatized and fictionalized as a literal comedy
- perverted justice made out as a bunch of reckless amateurs
- perverted justice falsely accused of enticing pedophiles with sexual comments
- movie ends with gay decoy singing musical to pedophile who kills himself claiming he just wanted a friend
Trash
People don't understand Napoleon's insane work ethic. Napoleon had secretaries rotating shifts so that he could wake up in the middle of the night and start dictating. Napoleon would sleep 3-4 hours on campaign in 15-30 minute segments so he could always be giving orders. Napoleon would read for 12hrs+ on abstruse subjects in a single day. Napoleon would position cannons himself when he saw soldiers not manning them. You think you're working hard enough but you're not. When you study the greats of history you realize the true level of output that it takes to be known by posterity.
Chris Hansen shares his reaction after finally seeing the movie “Primetime,” starring Robert Pattinson, which is based on him and the TV show “To Catch a Predator.”
Chris Hansen calls the movie over-the-top, an insult and a hit piece on him and the “To Catch a Predator” series, and when asked if there was a certain scene in the movie that he watched that didn’t happen, Chris Hansen says, “Almost every one of them.”
(🎥Have a Seat With Chris Hansen/Youtube)
2017: Austin spent $35 million on homelessness. 2,036 homeless counted.
2025: $118 million. 3,238 homeless.
Spending more than tripled and homelessness went up 59%.
If you service the homeless lifestyle, you will get more of it.
The NGOs that run this system get paid by the problem of homelessness, so they have no reason to end it -- in fact, their only incentive is to make sure the problem grows.
No one should pay for the reconstruction of Gaza except the people of Gaza. If they can't afford it, they should labor in tents until they can. This is the only way they'll learn accountability. As long as someone else keeps picking up the tab, they'll keep starting wars forever.
I didn't vote for the federal government raping Anthropic to death, but I'll take it.
This will completely destroy Anthropic as a company and then their assets can be bought for pennies. I'll say it again: Dario Amodei is worse than Sam Altman.
Netflix’s "Unabomber" movie releases today and I immediately noticed the SECOND cast listing is Shailene Woodley as FBI Agent Joanne Miller.
So of course, my WOKE ALARM went off and I asked Google AI:
Did they make up ANOTHER FEMALE FBI AGENT character for this?
GOOGLE:
"Yes. The character of Joanne Miller is entirely fictional.
Shailene Woodley’s character was created as a composite fictional FBI agent and written into the classic true-crime trope of the lone, brilliant investigator BATTING INSTITUTIONAL COMPLACENCY AND SEXISM.
In the film, FEMALE Agent Miller is the one who zeroes in on the linguistics of the manifesto.
In real life, it was MALE FBI PROFILER JAMES R. FITZGERALD who heavily pioneered forensic linguistics in analyzing Ted Kaczynski’s writing."
In other words, MORE STOLEN VALOR disguised as FEMALE EMPOWERMENT.
And if they were willing to make this change, what other LIES will their movie tell?
🖕NETFLIX.
When assisted suicide has a higher mortality rate than Peak Covid an event where you shut your country down to save the lives of old people you are now killing.
We live in such a clown world its unreal.
Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon became a media superstar after going public with his AI fears. He insisted that he wasn’t working with any third party organizations. Familiar sources told us a different story: DEY., a PR firm representing many of the most prominent AI safetyists, was booking his interviews.
One source, who had direct knowledge, even said DEY. preemptively booked Nate Soares, a prominent AI safety figure, for interviews that directly overlapped with Jacob going public.
Jacob working with DEY. is notable for two reasons: first, as mentioned, he previously said he wasn’t working with third parties. Second, we are in the middle of a national conversation about the future of AI that is actively determining how we regulate the most powerful technology in the world, largely thanks to the panic stirred up by Jacob — and it’s in the public’s interest to know who, exactly, is behind it.
Scoop from @huntryerson 👇
Mamdani is a Marxist-Islamist, America-hating, Jew-hating, radical who is destroying New York City and pushing his ideology beyond the 5-boroughs and into Congress. He is the enemy within. Utterly contemptible. Period. Full stop. He is to be fought at every turn and ultimately defeated, not appeased and assisted.
The NGOs end up increasing the number of homeless people they manage, because that’s the only way to increase their revenue! Incentives drive outcomes.
“Homeless” is a propaganda word used to describe people on the street who are mentally ill or severely addicted to drugs. The word implies that this is someone who fell a little behind on their mortgage payment and they’re one job offer away from getting back on their feet, which is obviously false if you’ve ever tried talking to a “homeless” person in SF, LA, NY, Austin or anywhere else.
The honest reality is that we need to bring back asylums for extreme mental illness or drug addiction for those who are a serious danger to themselves or others.
Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei warned the UN that AI could be used to make bioweapons. The same day, Anthropic announced a biology lab for its AI.
Dario Amodei told the UN Security Council that AI could be a danger to all of humanity. He said in one or two years, maybe less, AI could be like a country full of geniuses. And he named bioweapons as one of the biggest risks.
It all sounds nice. But this is my question to him.
You're worried AI could be a disaster, yet you're building a lab for the same AI you're warning the world about.
Are we supposed to trust you? Or are you saying you're the only sane person who can put AI to work on biology?
The easiest way AI could wipe out humanity is through a bio lab. You named bioweapons as a top risk yourself. By your own words, this AI is advanced and dangerous. And now you're giving it the tool it would need.
What are you playing at?
Sorry to state the obvious, but if someone has to hand you power, they have more power than you do.
There’s something objectively hilarious about arguing that women are uniquely qualified to run the world while constructing a hypothetical in which the people currently running it have to suspend the normal mechanisms by which humans acquire power and simply “put” women in charge.
If women were categorically better at acquiring, wielding, and maintaining power, we wouldn’t need a two-year global Make-A-Wish program where someone hands us the keys to civilization to prove it.
We’d have the fucking keys.