This could prove 100% accurate if he swaps ALL the Federal debt for T-Bills, then uses those T-Bills to back 0% yielding stablecoins, then cuts the rate on those T-Bills to 0.60% (b/c the banks don't deserve 3.5% on stablecoins).
You're gonna want to own more gold & BTC though.
Thanks to a generous credit of tokens from @PPQdotAI , Kimi K3 and an ape with a laptop (me) have conducted the following analysis of a bunch of projects / companies wallet softwares. @Coinkite , @OPENDIME , @SeedSigner , @Bitkey , @bluewalletio , @PhoenixWallet , @SparrowWallet , @Trezor , @Blockstream , @Ledger , @BitBoxSwiss , @SpecterDIY , @ElectrumWallet , @SamouraiWallet
🟡 Yellow ≠ broken. None of the nine Yellow products has a confirmed fund-loss-by-default flaw. Yellow means at least one of: (a) something security-critical sits outside independent verification. i.e., closed firmware or secure-element code (Opendime, Ledger, open source please!), vendor-run recovery infrastructure (Phoenix/ACINQ, Jade's oracle, Bitkey's WSM); (b) a real but bounded weakness, such as a zero-work-factor KDF (BlueWallet), weak legacy KDFs on a hot wallet (Electrum), no-SE DIY hardware with thin maintenance (SpecterDIY), a just-patched vulnerability awaiting its report (Bitkey); or (c) a dead/unmaintained product whose crypto reviewed clean (free Samourai!). In every case the entropy/key-generation path itself was reviewed and found sound unless the cell says otherwise.
I don't care whether you want to fork Bitcoin to save endangered raccoons or protect children from bullying. The cause is irrelevant.
Bitcoin's golden social rule is simple: if you try to fork Bitcoin without broad consensus, you lose—and you must lose decisively.
That rule is what makes Bitcoin resilient. Without it, Bitcoin becomes vulnerable to misinformation, false-flag campaigns, manufactured outrage, and social extortion. It fractures, corrodes, and eventually collapses.
If there is no broad consensus, there should be no fork date. Setting a deadline for a contentious fork is not coordination—it's extortion.
@Mononofu@satyanadella I think the fundamental argument for open-weighted AI is that the intelligence is built on the collectives. It's built on humanity's contribution to the knowlege base.
@BitQua I know you know this already. Thst your timeline gets a lot of unwanted bots noise. So, I do my bit to block the account/s after reviewing their timeline. You are still signal alpha in my book. 🤌
Unless @Apple's decision to terminate @craigraw's Apple Developer account is reversed by June 30, all new installs of Sparrow will fail, and development on macOS will end. If you value Sparrow, a repost would help. @AppleSupport
@shwoopies@BitQua@grok Kevin Marsh has sounded out to return the Fed to a more disciplined, market-oriented operational framework. Was this an early indication vis a vis "no forward guidance" policy?