@schweingehtbree@d_r_o_n_e I read it. There’s no way of reading of that sentence that comes away as “0 is generally not considered a natural number.” It reads very much as “0 is a natural number but there is an alternate and less preferred definition”.
@ChristopherKiss@jared_shult again with “they”. why is it so hard for you to have a conversation with me, without bringing other people from six years ago into it? you (confidently) said a dumb thing, and you have yet to own up to that. that’s all. that’s the whole
conversation. just your dumbness.
@ChristopherKiss@jared_shult you’re focusing on the wrong dumb part of the dumb thing you said. “X is just Y with one extra oxygen”, which i think you emphasized with caps, shows a lack of understanding of biochemistry and also a lack of self-awareness about how little you know about the subject.
@ChristopherKiss@jared_shult you keep bringing up other people, despite the fact that my responses have been directed at you and no one else. you said the stupid thing about hydrogen peroxide. just you. nobody else. you are a dumb idiot. that fact doesn’t in any way rely on anyone else.
@ChristopherKiss@jared_shult respectfully, i’m probably not going to take advice from you, since the only thing i know about you so far is that you’re the “+1 oxygen molecule” guy.
@ChristopherKiss@jared_shult antifreeze is just vodka with one extra oxygen atom (btw it’s an atom not a molecule). maybe chill on the hilariously bad biochemistry takes.
@jamestanton Might be worth specifying that the dots are non-overlapping, or that they have equal radius, or whatever other conditions you are assuming. Pretty easy to do given the lack of constraints.
@Rafi3AK For me it’s that if we redefined naturals to not include 0, we would almost immediately come up with a new set of numbers that is 0 and the naturals, and name it, because we would immediately get tired of how often we needed to describe that set the long way.
@abdimoalim_ I would say math shouldn’t feel that way - it isn’t useful. But authors have to make choices about what to include. I’d say that’s why books are often part, but not all of instruction. A competent instructor will spend the in-person time priming learners so the book has value.
@PhysInHistory Group Theory. It has a really low barrier of entry - most people are comfortable thinking about how things can be symmetric, and how you can rearrange the order of things. It also has a big bang for that buck in my opinion when it comes to being comfortable with mathy reasoning.
@straceX I type on a Dvorak layout. You can try to use it but it’s gonna take some time and I hope you have a pencil and paper (or my admin credentials) handy.
@LindaMeadWrites@thechosenberg There’s at least a third type, they brought the shovel, bought you a shovel because it seems like you often find yourself in these situations, and must pick who they do this whole shovel thing for given that others have done more with their shovels and you keep needing shovels.