@D7802G Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $250k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
Logic, Alex!π
it looks very pale...
Ledger used a laser to attack a Tangem chip in a lab. Zero funds lost, requires expensive equipment and physical access. Meanwhile Ledger themselves leaked 1M+ customer home addresses through a regular database breach, leading to real extortion threats sent to customersβ houses. Also admitted firmware can extract your seed phrase on government request. But yes β the laser thing is very cool.
@coinacademy_fr Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $250k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@UnderTradingYT Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $250k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
You absolutely right!
Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $250k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@RobynHD@Ledger@P3b7_@DonjonLedger Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $250k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@Princewilliesky@Tangem Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $250k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@blckchaindaily Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@Hey_rabbit_here Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@Crypto__Goku Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@AltcoinsFrance Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@TheBlockCo Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@crypto_banter Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@wublockchain12 Why the Ledger laser attack is unrealistic in real life :
π No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support
@Ky_CryptoX You absolutely right
No remote attack
π Physical access required
π§ͺ Laboratory-only attack
π No mass exploitation
πΈ Not economically scalable
π¬ $500k+ equipment
π¨βπ¬ Expert operators
π Visible card tampering
βοΈ No legitimate lab support