Natalie M

Interested in politics, the law, most sports***proud Trump supporter

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

Who was it that kept telling us during the fake Impeachment:
“No one is above the law” oh yea, that was nasty Nancy, hideous Hillary, Shifty Schiff, Nasty Nadler, etc- so that’s Great! they are with us! Obama is not above the law and either are they! Arrest them all!
#ObamaGate

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@truthbetold477 Is that the one that causes weight loss? So what’s your proof🙃

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@TheYoungJurks You will so regret your choices—-bookmark this

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@TheYoungJurks @trialwatchjess Try checking his videos or podcasts first, you pathetic excuse for a human.

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@TheYoungCryford @DK5877483230887 @TheYoungJurks @Chriskoalaj @DoctorTurtleboy Evil little POS…karma karma get rolling now…

[Microdots @DropMicrodots]

Next month tabloid rag Boston Magazine will select Michael Proctor as 'Man of the Year' and make the case that he was treated unfairly and should get his job back. This is satire but what's scary is it's really not.

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@Irish77Miss No brainer!

[David Yannetti @BostonDefender]

Respectfully, @djunaperkins, this is a political cheap shot and beneath your dignity.

You know nothing about the federal investigation, what evidence they had, how they investigated and why they got involved.

I had never met @adamdeitch before the Read case, but I am supporting him in this race because he has displayed the ethics, judgment and experience that are necessary to be district attorney.

In an office that featured festering incompetence and poor judgment, Adam is the breath of fresh air that is necessary to establish the office’s credibility and commitment to justice.

You owe him an apology.

[El Jafel @Will428304]

Mike Cryford is the softest man to open his mouth since Maplethorpe was inspired to pick up a camera.
If you ask BLT and Cryford who the “real supporters for Karen Read”are, they’ll tell you it’s them and will even, fart, cry, and tell you they wanna wrestle you if you say otherwise.

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@DoctorTurtleboy @KyleSharkey8 They are just not worth any time from any of us who understand science and the damn truth!

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@KYMaverickreal My dad had traditional Medicare (part A & Part B) plus a Gap plan. He went through Cancer treatment and much testing…my mom was left with almost zero medical bills ( you have to cover part B deductible).

[David Yannetti @BostonDefender]

A primer on unethical reporting and the priorities of certain media:

Every publication prides itself on thorough, accurate and ethical reporting. A lot of work — and a system of checks and balances— is supposed to be put into place to hopefully ensure that a publisher will NEVER have to issue a correction. If someone takes issue with an article but the publisher has an out because there was some ambiguity, a publisher will take that “out” and do anything to avoid having to publish a correction.

Issuing a correction is a black eye to the reporter, certainly. It signals to future editors that she cannot be trusted. But it is also embarrassing to the editors and the publisher, who are forced to admit that they failed at their jobs as well.

So now we come to @GretchenVoss64’s agenda-driven hit piece in @BostonMagazine. People ask why someone would not grant an interview to a reporter like her. You don’t grant someone like that an interview because you would be giving an untrustworthy person control over your words. She’s not seeking the truth, she’s advancing her own narrative, irrespective of (and often contrary to) the truth. And given her lack of ethics, she will take a quote from you and publish it out of context to make it appear as though you said something that you didn’t. To try to make you look bad to advance her agenda.

As an aside, those dangers are exactly why any criminal defense attorney will advise a client never to speak to the police.

I chose not to speak with @GretchenVoss6 because I knew her to be untrustworthy. And sure enough, she was so blinded by her own bias that she took an old quote of mine out of context and made it appear as though I said something that I didn’t. In the process, of course, she unwittingly proved what her intentions would have been had I agreed to speak with her in the first place. And by doing so, she put her magazine in legal jeopardy. Shame on her.

You can bet that when @BostonMagazine received my demand for a correction, they panicked. They consulted with their legal department, who advised them that there was no “out.” They recognized that it was one of the strongest defamation claims that could exist, because @GretchenVoss64 acted with actual malice and there was zero defense to what she did. They were loathe to do it but they had no choice. They issued the correction and hoped that would put the issue to bed.

I’m told, however, that the print edition still exists. I haven’t decided yet whether to take any further action regarding that clear defamation. In addition, there are many other inaccuracies in her “article” (although I will likely leave it to others to demand those corrections). For now, it is just satisfying — once again — to have exposed corruption.

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@WBfromSouthie @MafiaMasshole Perfectly stated—spot on!

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@Donnamg10 @MafiaMasshole @BostonDefender And the FBI questioned Jen before Aidan was even reporting on the case—weird

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@_Kaustik_ @MafiaMasshole @DoctorTurtleboy Don’t worry that will be their downfall…the forensic report…

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@jawalbert77 @MafiaMasshole Because she simply is a very non-relevant POS who so badly wants Aidan and he scorned her—she’s not a tough woman, she’s a scorned weakass vengeful “thing” but as we know these kinds will get there’s in spades.

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@little_foot777 What’s with all these women screaming victim, when they are the instigators? I find it offensive and reprehensible-as a woman!

[Machado's Invisalign GoFundMe @NahWay48191]

You'll never convince me that this NJ indictment wasn't a coordinated plan with Nan, KP, LTL and Mike.

[Natalie M @M26Nat]

@timburchett @LiTrade7 MA is possibly the most corrupt state in this country.Look into Karen Read Case & Aidan Kearney Case.The state is persecuting these two people, ruining their lives, bankrupting them while corrupt DAs, Judges, & Law Enforcement keep corrupting the system—horrific @TheJusticeDept

[Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe) @factsdontlie10]

“Kearney was the first to report this alternative theory” is also highly misleading. This statement makes it seem like @DoctorTurtleboy pulled this “theory” out of his ass.

It’s not a “made up conspiracy by a blogger and a murder defendant”

Kearney’s reporting CAME DIRECTLY FROM COURT FILINGS THAT WERE ALREADY FILED weeks before he even started looking into the case.

Karen Read has maintained her innocence since day 1. In the fall of 2022, she filed motions asking for Chloe’s animal control records and asking if there was ring camera footage from 34 Fairview.

Turtleboy simply took what the defense was alleging *from their court filings* and put it in laymen’s terms and posted to social media. People read it and obviously got hooked because WHAT THE FUCK- Jen McCabe googled ‘hos long to die in cold’ at 2:27am and that was the only google search marked as “deleted” out of 4,560 google searches.

I’m surprised the McAlberts aren’t claiming Kearney and Read conspired with Cellebrite to “frame Jen McCabe” 🙄

FFS.
Y’all are liars.

[Кarl Hungus @hungus14]

Grant unintentionally makes a good point. And this indirectly props up the theory behind the push for cameras in every facet of government.

For almost all 250 years of our country, 99% of the administration of it has been in (practical) secrecy. The (bipartisan) arguments in the Senate Judiciary Committee that were made about the Bill to require live streams in all federal courts all claim more and more people are becoming more interested and involved in politics. This is a good thing.

Here, I don’t have to explain what would happen if judge Gildea made a serious error of law like this even 20 years ago. Nobody would see it, and Grant wouldn’t have caught it.

So, Gildea’s fetish for solemnity, now, today, is better suited for an assisted living facility, where he can be corrupt without harming honest law abiding citizens in search of fair justice.