It’s always seize, never build.
Socialists don’t talk about learning how to bake, buying ovens, hiring staff, or serving customers. They talk about kicking in the door once someone else has done all of that and calling the theft “justice.”
What makes the theater especially rich is that, by their own standards, most of these cosplay revolutionaries would starve within a week without the productivity they despise. They produce nothing, maintain nothing, and coordinate nothing. They survive on the surplus created by the very people they resent.
Their only path to power isn’t competence or creation. It’s guilt.
Convince producers they’re immoral for succeeding.
Convince them that self-defense is cruelty.
Convince them that surrender is virtue.
That’s the entire program.
Not liberation through production.
Not prosperity through trade.
But moral blackmail dressed up as revolution, asking you to applaud while you hand over your freedom to people who couldn’t run a bakery for a single morning.
"No, immigration isn't causing housing prices to spike"
"No, safe supply is not worsening drug addiction"
"No, taking down statues is not erasing history"
"No, pandemic spending is not driving inflation"
Canadians have every right and reason to be worried about the uncertainty of their property rights, and to be skeptical of those who try to bully them into being quiet.
@OldGit21 @JoosyJew@amnesty I pressed the 🚽 flush button on them after they wrote a big expose claiming Ukraine was at fault for resisting the Russian invasion
Utterly compromised and morally corrupt garbage organization 🤮
Ray, the mistake is assuming this is a geography problem. It isn’t. It’s a governance failure.
Canada was founded on a core constitutional principle: no province can block another province’s access to markets. That is precisely why interprovincial pipelines, railways, and ports fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction. The federal government’s job is to ensure goods and resources move freely across provinces.
What we are seeing today is the opposite. The federal government has repeatedly stated that BC and certain First Nations effectively have veto power over Alberta’s resources transiting BC. That position directly contradicts the Constitution and a foundational principle of Confederation. Canada, in this respect, is no longer functioning as designed.
Ironically, this is why the “landlocked Alberta” argument fails. Under a properly functioning Canada, Alberta is not landlocked at all. Ottawa is simply refusing to exercise the authority it already has.
And here’s the part critics ignore: an independent Alberta would actually have leverage Canada refuses to use. Roughly $17 billion in BC exports move eastward through Alberta by rail, and highway. Alberta would control that transit as a sovereign state—just as other inland countries do through transit agreements.
Independence wouldn’t eliminate trade routes; it would require mutual access agreements, where leverage runs both ways. Canada currently allows BC to block Alberta while Alberta has no reciprocal authority. That asymmetry disappears under independence.
The real question isn’t whether Alberta is “landlocked.” It’s why the federal government is failing to enforce the Constitution—and why Albertans are expected to accept permanent economic obstruction with no leverage at all.