🎉New Website published🎉
🎁To celebrate the launch of the new website, we are giving away three annual Burp Bounty Pro licenses!
👉To participate you have to retweet and like. The winners will be announced on September 30.
👉https://t.co/DXxo2SKrY7
@maldr0id even if his claim was true it'd be irrelevant. he claims it's impossible that that domain was used for infection cause it was registered after whatsapp patched vuln in voip stack. But citizenlab says that domain was used for sms infection (one-click)
@InsiderPhD@ctrl_Felix@LiveOverflow Not only that. But he goes on to say MVT is unreliable because people can send domain IOC to themselves and it will show as infected. I mean...yes?
@VessOnSecurity@wdormann@GossiTheDog I got my USB drive infected with it few days ago from the copy shop. It moved all my files to folder "USB drive" and then made shortcut that looked like it's going to USB drive (with that network share icon). Ofc in reality it executed malicious command
@messithelastdon @ptracesecurity @Securityblog No. It's if you find XSS vuln in web app. It's just another potential impact of XSS. Useful if for instance you find reflected xss on error page functionality and app uses HTTPOnly cookies + csrf tokens (and you can't exfil token other way).
@vxunderground or birthday paradox, in one password reset token scenario. basically whenever client rolls some weird custom login/register/reset scheme
@vxunderground Basic probability came in handy few times during web app pentests, mostly to determine whether some sort of bruteforce is viable (e.g OTP that changes every 60 seconds)
@rstein357 @shakesomuch @temblor@ch_gruetze Well that's bit worrying given that march ones were 5.5 and 5.0 and damaged a lot of old buildings in Zagreb. Is it possible to have breakdown of probabilities by fault ? And what would be probability of another 5.5? Sorry for a lot of questions
@temblor 2/2 "another large, damaging shock nearer to Zagreb by a factor of three, but the probability is still low, at about a 1% chance over the next year. " Unless if you don't consider 5 magnitude earthquake damaging
@temblor "we find that the chance of another shock of magnitude-5.0 or greater over the next year is about 15%" is this probability exclusively for Petrinja fault? Otherwise it seems in contradiction with (1/2)
@EatSleepPwnRpt This is great news! I remember one ctf (SHA ctf I believe) that also had junior version, they made it so one could solve all junior challenges and it'd count as one "senior" challenge. Do you plan the same thing?
We want to proudly announce that this year's C3 CTF will have a less hardcore "Junior version" for beginners, people with little time to spare during the C3, and people who want to get into new challenge categories. https://t.co/DY5uflFIbT
Tell your friends at C3!