@MrAndyNgo@DAGToddBlanche Well. He isn’t ripping off Medicare, so there’s that. Doesn’t run NGOs that destabilize the country, chase ICE agents around and spit on them, or run fake elder care or daycare facilities. I mean, this is what we’ve come to expect from our newly minted “migrants”, right?
@RobSchneider@MayorBorowsky Rob, you didn’t move far enough away from California woke, leftist liberalism. Just look at your Governor and Senators. Seems woke liberalism has infected AZ. Try Nashville (like Starbucks is now for its HQ). Seems like a great town for entertainment, as well.
@VietQNguyen The pandemic had an impact. Sure. But the socialists are going in for the kill with anti-business sentiment and higher taxes to spend on worthless initiatives that have zero ROI. A boycott of Starbucks? Really?
@amuse@SecMullinDHS@FBI@ICEgov For the life of me, I don’t understand why DHS doesn’t just ask people to watch the documentary “Narco Cultura” on Amazon, which is about the cartels in Juarez (just across the Rio Grande from El Paso). Police must mask themselves, because their families get murdered. It’s sick.
@JamesBa054@Bubblebathgirl@KennedyNation The passing on of notes from American prisoners to the North Vietnamese solders was a dastardly act. Our men were just young soldiers doing their jobs. Pawns, not generals. They ended up beaten and executed for trying to tell their families through Hanoi Jane that they were alive
@DLoesch@HillaryClinton Yeah. I’d say the cigar incident was far more tawdry than a sporting event. Then the Biden cocaine house. Naked trans dancer (topless) house. A sporting event is more in line with The People’s House.
@adamcarolla Yikes. And where did the trans dude learn to lisp like that? It’s all a cosplay to imitate his idea of a girly girl. And, now real girls need to compete with his superior muscle strength, muscle density and lung capacity, bone structure and so on. It’s actually sickening.
@sfordnyc@Timcast Unlike you, I’ve investigated scores of sexual harassment cases in the workplace. Not only does this phony case not meet any criminal legal standard (which is why Bragg passed on it), there’s zero evidence to pass a civil standard (51% preponderance). Your “hunch” is zero. Enough
@sfordnyc@Timcast Sure. And security goes home early before closing. The cameras are turned off. Staff doesn’t help out in changing areas. Sure. The woman didn’t even remember the year. So Trump was just waltzing around alone looking for prey? Give it a break. Anderson Cooper had to shut her up.
@PolitlcsUK Wow. Dude in the light blue outfit has some mad boxing skills. He’d have done well in prison! Now? He’s going to mash up society. Well done, UK!
@gehrig38@RobOn1100 yeah, I forget how they came to 34 counts. Did he breathe 34 times while signing a document someone else handed him? You know, for the $100K+ in a $70B corporation? Not even a rounding error. And already barred by statute of limitations. A Frankensteined claim for 0.
@SPOG1952@MayorofSeattle Now, over 1.1 million. I’m so shocked and saddened to see what’s happened to Seattle since the “Chop Zone” days and “Summer of Love.” I used to live in the Escala building at 4th and Virginia, and it was bad in 2012-2014. Now? I’d never consider going downtown unless necessary.
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.