Test pilot/commercial astronaut who’s Forest Gumped his way through an amazing aerospace piloting career. Didn’t write “Test Gods”, just takes the blame ;)
I’m on X for two main reasons - 1) to give unique insight into aerospace topics garnered from my unusually broad test pilot career. 2) To inject humor (usually sarcastic and sophomoric at best) in the hopes of getting at least one person to smile.
Follow me if you want to live…
You know it will be a good ceremony when they have such cool ceiling ornaments. I was purposely early so I took a stroll around the amazing aircraft displays. Some guy was standing next to a woman by the SR-71 explaining “the entire thing is made out of *magnesium*!”
I kept my mouth shut and kept walking
@Hush_Kit Chief Warrant Officer Bernie "Hondo" Coleman is a flight test engineer in the control room, a logistics officer, push-up enforcer, flight deck/arresting gear specialist, confident, that somehow always gets orders tied to Maverick’s
Some LC-36 updates. Now that we’ve had access to the pad and integration facility we can share a bit of good news. The propellant farm, oxygen, liquid hydrogen and LNG tanks are all in good shape. This is good luck because these are very long lead items. The water tower is also good. The big support tower is damaged, but it can be repaired in place rather than torn down and replaced. The booster “Never Tell Me The Odds” and the three GS-2s that were onsite in the integration facility also look good.
I’ve seen some speculation that we might move directly to the 9x4 configuration, but we won’t do that. Rate manufacturing of 7x2 is going well, and we’re going to continue that at pace as planned and store the stages for use. In addition, we had already been working for some time on eliminating our transporter-erector in favor of an alternative vertical conop, and we’ll now go directly to that; so we don’t need a new transporter-erector.
We will fly again before the end of this year. Gradatim Ferociter.
Actually, I can think of a couple examples.
IMO, the space industry tries too hard to justify [eye rolling] “firsts”. Maybe driven by funding or PAOs trying to justify their jobs but often it seems driven by their customers who desperately need some kind of first for their ego wall. I’m reminded of the movie “Rocketman”.
“I’m the first person to moonwalk on Mars!”
“Well sorry, Mr. First to show inappropriate behavior on Mars!”
It will be interesting to understand the setup (will the launch date depend on the researcher’s biological cycle?), what instrumentation will be used, and what data collected during the couple of minutes of microgravity? How do the boost forces immediately prior to the short period of microgravity affect the data? What will be learned of value as opposed to what has already been learned by the numerous “real” female astronauts that have orbited onboard space stations for months at a time?
Welcoming Operation Period to our 2027 spaceflight manifest. This will be the first spaceflight ever dedicated to studying menstruation in microgravity, investigating how space travel affects menstrual physiology, with implications for astronaut health and reproductive medicine on Earth. This is what inclusive-by-design research looks like → https://t.co/orze0lpiEf
@DrDave_99@aviationarchive@BuzzLightSabre Instrumented weak link had a breaking strength of 24,500 lbs. I suggested that value because it was 80% the takeoff gross weight (bottom of suggested range for sailplanes), allowed us a good takeoff acceleration (could release and abort at Vrot), = F-106 empty wt & = J75 thrust.