For your final #UW_Archy269 check-in @ us with your fav Item of pop culture (music, video, game, etc.). What stories can archaeologists tell about your item?
(Prof. G's current fav: Real Housewives. It's a case study in materializing class and gender relations.)
@longwalkoutside Ravenna Park is a particular fav. It's just a block from me and I love checking on all the plants to see how they're doing. It's nettle season and soon maple blossom time!
#UW_Archy269 for our Monday check-in, please respond with 1-2 description of your favorite ruin, landmark, or place in Seattle (or your hometown). Be sure to include a photo! What emotions does this place inspire? What histories is it privy to? Who is connected to that place?
Thank you for the compliments on my graphic book review! A lot of folks are saying that they assign things like this as an #unessay. That is super cool! Let's do that ourselves and submit an #unarticle. Let's make our science more accessible inside the journal.
#UW_Archy269 concerned about your Unessay project? Don't know where to begin or how to narrow down your topic? Check out this thread for example Unessay projects and tips on Unessays!#LetsChat#OfficeHours
https://t.co/EOSexXD1w3
In addition to the examples provided by our prior cohort, check out the examples provided here for Dr. Gilmour's course: https://t.co/xGb7IcpEA1
#UW_Archy269#UnessayProjects
#UW_Archy260 for our Monday check-in, referring to our case studies by Kiddey and Zimmerman, draw out your definition for the archaeology of homelessness. @ us with your illustrated definitions and be sure to tag them with our hashtag!
For our #UW_Archy269 Monday check-in & Panel discussion we're doing a Coming up for Air exercise. Please @ us with 1 of the following: a call for clarification, a question for general discussion, or your key takeaway(s) from .@jason_p_deleon's The Land of Open Graves.
@karalou_ Doing these things allows your audience to interrogate the quality of the interpretations you are offering. That more people also often engage with the work means review can even be more robust than the blind reviews of journals where 2-3 reviewers determine whether to publish.
@karalou_ Some of the best public scholarship I've seen does a couple things. 1, scholars clearly lay out their expertise. 2, they clearly present their data (raw and visualizations), and 3, they respond to critiques/questions they receive.