@web3__raider@cifer_security lifetime access attached to a rare outcome definitely changes the psychology of the reveal. there’s something functional at stake.
Posting daily about AI tools means I spend a ridiculous amount of time just finding what is actually worth testing.
Finding new launches is easy. Figuring out which ones are genuinely new and actually work is the annoying part.
So I handed that workflow to an AI employee.
He finds what launched, checks it against what I have already covered, opens the remaining tools and tests whether they actually do what they advertise.
Then he gives me the shortlist and I decide what makes the cut.
The part I like most is that he still asks before doing anything that needs extra access. He proposed getting write access to my archive so he could file what I cover. I kept it switched off until I approved it.
Creators: how much of your week is spent finding what to create about instead of actually creating?
Try free at @viktor_com. $100 in credits, no card. Full link in my first reply.
Paid Partnership
Nobel Heroes & AI4SCI Gala Dinner
Five Nobel Laureates have already confirmed their attendance, representing economics, physics, chemistry and life sciences.
WTF. I just audited what my AI coding actually costs me, and it's insane.
I’m chewing through roughly 1 BILLION tokens every single day, generally defaulting to models around an "AA intelligence 54" level.
Fortunately, this open-source project analyzes your usage to recommend a stack of models that are not only a step up in intelligence, but cost a fraction of the price.
Shouting out the decentralized & alternative AI platforms making this possible: @qspro_ai, @near_ai, and @AskVenice@akashnet.
Try it out for your own stack: https://t.co/OSVaLJoLYg