Rainman

Retired O-5 with 30 years service. Military systems designer, cyber warfare, and engineer. Advanced scuba diver, motorcyclist, and yachtsman.

[Chaplain America @RealChapAmerica]

Trump said he would fire military leaders who violate our service members' rights during the Covid mandate. Can we at least get that?

[Autumn Smith @AntiCorrupt1984]

@BrianOSheaSPI @RealBrianOShea
Check this out 👇🏼
https://t.co/XQ07FKluJU

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

Ask your own people. Who do you know …

Seven out of ten. That’s the number in an American Family News poll. More than 1,100 responses over four days.

29 percent could not name anyone hurt by the COVID shot. 27 percent named a family member. 24 percent a friend or co-worker. 14 percent a neighbour. 5 percent said it was them.

Put the last four together and 71 percent said they know someone adversely affected, or they are that someone.

Nicolas Hulscher called it a massive signal of public concern that should not be brushed aside. He also said the poll is informal. So did the reporter.

It is their audience, not a random sample of the country. Fine. Read it that way.

Even in a room that already had doubts, 5 percent said the injury was theirs. More than half pointed at someone they live with, work with, or live next door to.

A German survey in late 2024 had one in six reporting a reaction. VAERS is the official pile, and the studies on that system say less than 1 percent of injuries historically get reported.

They called it rare. The people answering this did not have to go looking for a case. They had a name.

https://t.co/fMfLek5daf

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@BuzzPatterson Be sure to take a detour to stimulate that Vegas nerve.

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@McMacN1 @SisePete @BeschlossDC Nice try. The Civil Rights Act passed the final Senate vote with 82% of Republicans and 69% of Democrats.

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@grok @eec2637838 @xislayy @grok make Optimus themed hands with this hand gesture.

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@xislayy @grok @grok What hand gesture would you be making when answering a query with Grok SuperHeavy?

[Joseph Warren Founding Martyr @MartyrJose1776]

🧵🚨🚨 Failed Reinstatement Implementation of a 32 U.S.C. AGR slot governed by 10 U.S.C. §12310.

.@SecWar , @PeteHegseth ,@DOWResponse @DoW_USW_PR
The National Guard Bureau (NGB) has a problem with its “this is solely a State decision” theory.

Reminder: the Army Board for Corrections of Military Record (ABCMR) has already determined an Injustice occurred in Reprimanding me and separating me. https://t.co/zQZeYcfeLb

Look at 10 U.S.C. §12310(c).

Congress specifically addressed National Guard members serving Full-Time National Guard Duty under 32 U.S.C. §502(f) while assigned to Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams (WMD-CSTs).

§12310(c) authorizes those Guard members to perform WMD/CST emergency-preparedness duties, provides for their federally funded pay and expenses, and—this is important—requires those personnel to be counted against the federally authorized personnel strengths in 10 U.S.C. §115(a)(1)(B) and §115(a)(2).

That matters in my case.

I served as Deputy Commander of Maine's 11th WMD-CST in Title 32 AGR status. Both my original and corrected DD Form 214s identify the 11th Civil Support Team as my last duty assignment.

The governing National Guard regulations go even further: WMD-CST AGR positions are tied to Department of the Army (DA)-approved TDAs, congressional authorization and appropriation, NGB AGR allocations, and Title 32 FTNGD.

Yes—the Governor/TAG retains operational command in Title 32. I have never disputed that.

But State command is not the same thing as exclusive State legal authority.

So here is the question NGB should have to answer:
How can NGB defend a State's refusal to implement my ABCMR relief by calling my AGR restoration “solely a State decision” when Congress itself placed my WMD-CST Title 32 service inside this federal statutory, funding, manpower, and regulatory framework—and the Secretary of the Army's own correction board already found an injustice and directed corrective relief?

Table of Authorities:
10 U.S.C. §12310(c) + 10 U.S.C. §115 + 32 U.S.C. §502(f) + 10 U.S.C. §1552.

[Autumn Smith @AntiCorrupt1984]

@MaryBowdenMD @drdrew I signed as a candidate....Still waiting for my approval
I would like to MAHA my city home to Kelloggs and next to Pfizer!!!
https://t.co/XQ07FKluJU

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@MartyrJose1776 @PeteHegseth @SecWar @grok Estimate the formal and informal influence Timothy Zimmerman could have on the ABCMR process on this case, having worked there recently.

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

Mike is fighting the good fight - help him out if you can.
https://t.co/On1O0HNjvg

[Joseph Warren Founding Martyr @MartyrJose1776]

🧵🚨🚨🚨🇺🇸🇺🇸
Saturday (26Sept26) I spoke at the Maine Common Sense Fair.

I’m now 90 days into waiting for a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss in my federal lawsuit. Federal Case – Gary v. Department of the Army et al. (-cv-00272, D.D.C.)

I used the opportunity to tell my own story—and to explain the broader problems service members are encountering as they try to obtain the reinstatement and relief they believe they were promised.

This was the soft launch of my next media push: raising awareness about military reinstatement failures and raising support for my continuing legal fight.

What struck me most were the people I met:

I met a descendant of Samuel Prescott, the Patriot who completed the Midnight Ride mission after Paul Revere was captured. He heard my story and made a generous cash donation to my legal fight.

I also met a doctor who told me he lost his medical license and practice during the COVID era. After hearing what I am fighting, he also made a generous cash donation.

You can donate to my Pro Se legal fund here: https://t.co/MycN1OcQZW

A lady had extra Duty to Disobey DVDs; we distributed them amongst the crowd and ask them to consider a donation to the @ChildrensHD

But the reaction I heard again and again was:
“I thought this had already been fixed.”

When I explained how difficult it has been to navigate the bureaucracy and actually obtain reinstatement relief, people went from shocked → dumbfounded → dismayed → angry.

Many Americans apparently believe the military reinstatement issue is over.

It isn’t.

Any Media interested in interviewing me on my lawsuit and reinstatement story please reach out and I'll enlighten you on what is actually going on. @MaineWireJon @TheMaineWire @unquirer @JMPhelpsLC @MuddyWatersME @rondeaulivia and others

Follow this thread. I’m going to show you what the reinstatement process actually looks like—and why I’m still fighting. 🇺🇸

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@AaronRDay Lummis.

[Aaron Day @AaronRDay]

The "Clarity Act" is a 616-page Trap

Cynthia Lummis calls it 600 pages. Count again. It's 616. And she wants it across the finish line before you read it.

1/ A single letter freezes your funds for 30 days. Extendable another 150.
2/ No judge. No charge. No warrant. The freeze can be kept secret by the company.
3/ A state cop, a federal cop, or Treasury sends the letter. You're "reasonably suspected." The company is immune. The one who pulled the trigger cannot be sued.

They call it clarity. Watch what it actually says.

[Autumn Smith @AntiCorrupt1984]

https://t.co/XQ07FKluJU

[Brad Miller @BradMiller1010]

I was looking thru files today & came across this old gem. 😎

Imagine being a division commander and giving this letter of reprimand to one of your battalion commanders because you were too naive to see what the covid shot & covid shot mandate were actually about. Then imagine relieving that battalion commander one week later because he refused to go along with the "big lie" (in the totalitarian sense).

That's exactly what my division commander did.

The mandate was unequivocally unlawful (and a strategic blunder). Orders associated with the mandate were also unlawful. Refusing to comply with the mandate was therefore not only NOT unlawful, but actually a duty & a moral obligation.

My division commander, along with virtually every other senior military leader, pushed this unlawful policy that caused incalculable physical & moral injury on the force. The strategic effects will immeasurably impact our armed forces for years to come.

When it comes to such a wide scale policy that is so glaringly despotic, egregiously unlawful, and strategically destructive, SILENCE IS CONSENT and yet ALL currently serving senior military leaders either through their direct support or by their cowardly silence, permitted this to happen.

And many of them would allow it to happen again because they lack the strategic insight to understand the real threats facing this country and/or lack the moral resolve to stand up to those threats.

The language in this memo is telling. It not just distorts but also actively INVERTS the truth. My actions, and the effects of those actions, are the opposite of what is claimed in the memo. Much of what is inaccurately attributed to me in this memo is actually true of the mandate itself and/or those who implemented it.

The MANDATE itself was "unjustifiably" implemented, was "unacceptable," and "adversely impact[ed] the health and readiness of the force." The MANDATE "undermined the effectiveness" of the unit. Pushing the MANDATE was the "irresponsible and improper behavior."

How many currently serving senior military leaders pushed similar letters of reprimand to their subordinates due to the unlawful covid shot mandate?

How many leaders have actually acknowledged the damage they caused?

[Rainman @X_L_Systems]

@grok @ZPEdisclosure Inventors might see this as the law having a lack of Constitutional legitimacy and the DoJ unwilling to have it challenged in court. It empowers threats and submission, not with a solid Constitutional standing.

[Doug Casey @RealDougCasey]

It’s said that war is nature’s way of teaching Americans geography.

It can now be said that diesel is another way of teaching them geography—plus chemistry. And they’re getting a graduate degree in it right now.

The wars in the Ukraine, Iran, and now Houthiland have doubled the price of fuels in the last six months. And I believe they’re going higher.

I continue to be long mining stocks, oil and gas stocks, uranium stocks, and commodities in general.

Energy stocks are only about 4% of the S&P. In 1980, they were about 30% of the S&P. And mining is about 1% of the S&P. In the past, it’s usually been about 8%.

These areas are historically very, very cheap.

A new trend is in motion, and I expect it will stay in motion for at least a couple more years.

Remember the old market rule: Be right and sit tight.

You don’t have to be wild and crazy at this point. Resource stocks should multiply your money several times just in the next few years.

[Rob Braxman Tech (Official) @rob_braxman]

Border Officials Asks For My Phone. These 4 Setups Decide What They Get