Stefano Cirolini

Alive

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@Judgenap is this stolen content?

https://t.co/YWKAO6aS2s

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@waitbutwhy @threadreaderapp unroll

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@KMutisi Africans need visa for Russia too
https://t.co/cucPY5AZJF

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@MarianSmedley @SSGMegaWatz @Shanna9650 @poppopohyeah @centristspeaker @thehill then let's have different categories based on muscolar mass, something like they do in boxe

what has sex or gender to do with it?

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@Glaseatr @tolep @SethDillon "grow a pair" of what?

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@monitoringbias Oh well, one can stop worrying about being the perfect parent then.
Our children have our genes, so they are doomed from the start.

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@mrk4m1 e quindi?
lo stato cinese è il proprietario della terra, e il proprietario può fare quello che vuole con ciò che possiede, no?
anche distruggerlo (l'hai detto tu)

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@TRHLofficial Different words usually have different meanings.

Nevermind, let's call it body-sex and mind-sex...

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@eduardsneeuw @polititrolls @Timcast wrong example. one does not become a Jew, it's not a choice, you are born one

try atheist vs religious

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@giubileif a meno che per "identità" non si intenda "essere identici": quello sì, non lo vuole nessuno

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@giubileif io questa scomparsa dell'identità non la vedo proprio. fra identity politics, la riscoperta dei dialetti, le spinte federaliste e indipendentistiche, c'è forse molta più "identità" che in passato

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@datepsych perhaps unattractive women are reputed less likely to marry, have children and quit

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@CottarelliCPI è un royality show

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@Chimpin69854465 @TheRealDHR @0a0505 @SecretBaboon @datepsych @BookofOak @kareem_carr There's a quote (don't remember by whom) that says that intelligent people look at the world, find patterns (that's g) and ask "why?". Creative people look at the world, see what isn't there, and ask "why not?".

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@datepsych "Intelligence" is a loaded term, since we are told that intelligence is what distinguishes the humans from the other animals.
Claiming that someone has lower intelligence is thus the same as claiming they are less human.

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@Chimpin69854465 @TheRealDHR @0a0505 @SecretBaboon @datepsych @BookofOak @kareem_carr Probably a minimum level of g is required, above that it's the personality that counts.
At high IQ levels, the variance of results is higher than at lower levels.
Some say that the capacity of focusing, of self control, of "grit" are the driving factors.

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@Chimpin69854465 @TheRealDHR @0a0505 @SecretBaboon @datepsych @BookofOak @kareem_carr point is, there's no single factor that determines what one person can or cannot do intellectually. intelligence is a factor, which can be split in subfactors, personality is another, also composed of subfactors.
there isn't a single measure, a single scale of "mind capacity"

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@Chimpin69854465 @TheRealDHR @0a0505 @SecretBaboon @datepsych @BookofOak @kareem_carr my point exactly: there isn't only one type of intelligence. we are not all scaled down versions of Einstein (or whoever)

[Stefano Cirolini @_StefanoC_]

@RichardHanania does "white victims" include himself and family?
just curious