أبو سميّة

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

Why doesn't he want to do Mubaha on whether his belief regarding the issue of Hukm Bighayri Maa Anzalallaah is correct or not?

[Project Guiding Light @ProjectGuiding]

This Mudallis attempts to score a cheap “win,” after I’ve been openly saying debating Madkhalis is a waste of time, since they’re not sincere. I’ve discussed with him multiple times and went back and forth, very cordially I might add, and I even tried to get him to discuss things privately, multiple times. I was even making Duā for his Hidāyah at one point. The fact that he’s saying I refused to discuss with him publicly and privately is a blatant lie, which even Madkhalis can attest to, but this individual is a known liar, so I’m not surprised.

Many who have seen our discussions left Madkhalism, by the Fadhl of Allah. The brothers and I have refuted every Shubuhah these Zanadiqa have brought, by The Fadhl of Allah Alone, so to waste further time on these clowns is likely sinful.

All in all, I found him to be insincere, arrogant, and quite frankly, stupid — which is why I stopped engaging with him. This seems to have struck a nerve. He’s allegedly heard my Hujjah, and I have heard his, and I’ve even taken the extra step and skimmed through most of his pathetic and sloppy book that allegedly, even Ar-Rayyis was “too busy” to read and endorse, lol. It comprises of recycled arguments that have long been refuted, as well as new arguments which even the Dawud bin Jarsis (Ar-Rayyis) of our time wouldn’t dare make. The Ikhwah and I have refuted them none-the-less.

At this stage, all that’s left is a Mubahalah. Imam Ibn Al Qayyim رحمه الله said in Zād Al-Ma’ād:

أن السنة في مجادلة أهل الباطل إذا قامت عليهم حجة الله ولم يرجعوا بل أصرُّوا على العناد أن يُدعَوا إلى المباهلة.وقد أمر الله سبحانه بذلك رسولَه ولم يقل: إن ذلك ليس لأمتك من بعدك، ودعا إليه ابن عمِّه عبد الله بن عباس لمن أنكر عليه بعض مسائل الفروع (٢) ولم يُنكِر عليه الصحابة، ودعا إليه الأوزاعيُّ سفيانَ الثوريَّ في مسألة رفع اليدين (٣) ولم ينكر عليه ذلك؛ وهذا من تمام الحجة.

If you need help with the translation let me know insha’Allah. Cut the fake tough guy postering, put your money where your mouth is (don’t worry the Mubahalah will be free of charge, no gofundme or $ 20 paywall required), and we’ll do a Mubahalah on whether my Aqeedah is the Aqeedah of the Khawarij or not. We will make Duā that Allah destroy the liar and incorrect amongst us, and that Allah make us a sign for His Curse and Punishment among the people. You can invite any one of your buddies and they can join in on the Mubahalah. I can bring my brother Abu Dujanah, who has discussed this matter with you and your heretical ilk prior, multiple times.

We can do so on a neutral live (that we both agree on). Not on yours, or any one of your buddies’ panel. Let’s get this organized Insha’Allah. Don’t be a chicken.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@mjhdlover @_AbuMuhammad_ So this is when he was Murji?

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@_AbuMuhammad_

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@_AbuMuhammad_ You mean this one? This is also about legislating it and making it as a constitution for the people to act on.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@seekingi1lm Do you know Arabic? If so I don't have to translate everything. Also have you read the context from the actual text of Ibn Taymiyya?

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

How's this guy understanding the texts?

If you fix a particular outcome & then go for finding (supporting) evidence for that, this is what happens.

You need to learn to understand the texts without fixing an outcome initially to get a better understanding of what it states.

[Abu Mujahid Al-Qurashi @seekingi1lm]

Ibn Taymiyyah and Ulama of Najd takfir of the one who permits a haram matter while admitting its haram in Islam and without ascribing to Allah. With no Udhr bil Jahl

Just as the rulers permit RIBA in there lands.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@BrotherUnknown0 Ta'ah to Allah can also be ibaadah
It does not mean ta'ah to other than Allah by itself is Shirk Akbar.

Similar is the case of Judging - by judging by what Allah has revealed - the judge is dong ta'ah to Allah, and by judging by other than this - he's doing ma'siyah.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@BrotherUnknown0 Does the one who does a good deed just to show off a Mushrik?

The judges who believe in the Tahreem yet judges by other than Allah's law (whether man-made laws) is not doing it with the intention of taqarrub or ibadah to the laws.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@BrotherUnknown0 @Alelislam Have you read this hadeeth.

Were these yahood "not implementing the Hukm of Allah" or were they "ruling by man made laws"?

So salaf were so retarded that they brought this in the Tafseer of the verse which says "whoever DOES NOT JUDGE by..."?

Do you hear yourself?

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@seekingi1lm So do you hold the view that

1) a judge who rules by a man-made law in a specific instance while believing it to be haram is a Kafir (not legislating, but judging) ?

2) the one who does not Takfeer this person is a Murji or a Misguided one?

[Shaffaf Ahmed @shaffaafahmed]

Instead of calling it "bank rate", let's be truthful and call it "subsidized rate". And instead of calling it "black market rate", let's call it "market rate". And then let's decide what we want to be subsidized. And by how much we want to subsidize things.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@shahmir69420 وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@shahmir69420 Has the shaykh stated any narrations under this category even in any other duroos or book?

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@bankofmaldives @Ratnaya2Prabath No, you guys did agree during a call that there was such an issue last month and it's been like that for some days and you guys have no idea when it'll be resolved citing it as a technical issue. DON'T LIE saying you have not identified any such.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@sixsonde @bankofmaldives @ShumbaGong Yeah shows the same error that MVR transaction limit has been reached even though it's a card linked to USD account, last month they said it's a technical issue.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@yaxynn @bankofmaldives @jade4443 Maybe by default it's not excluded and it is only excluded once the customer makes an official complaint so that the dollar exhaustion will be slowed down very much.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@seekingi1lm So basically whoever says "I'm a Madhkhali" is done individual Takfeer based on this?

But even Nasir al-Fahd excuse those who say "I'm a democrat" if he doesn't "intend" the kufri meaning.

You guys are another level.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@mjhdlover @jado375 So a fatwa prohibiting it implies that the ruling of it in the religion of Allah is that it is haram.

But this is not the case with making such a rule prohibiting it in a household unless accompanied by i'tiqaad.

I hope you understand the difference.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@mjhdlover @jado375 Basically issuing a fatwa is informing the questioner the Hukm of Allah on the matter being asked. Or informing the shar'ī Hukm for the wāqi'.

[أبو سميّة @abusum3yya]

@mjhdlover @jado375 Al-Sharī'ah and Al-Sharāi' is what Allah has legislated for his servants from the matters of Religion

Al-Khalīl b. Ahmad