@TVGrimReaper@NateTidwell86 I've heard complaints about the production of sports events for Paramount outside the US, so, in theory (OK, Not that plausible) a combined company could use the TNT Sports infrastructure. For fans in the US, yes, nothing there, only services constrained by Pemex level debt.
@JordanOnBrand@TVGrimReaper I see Netflix as TV, but I think that if Netflix is not the utility nor the fabulous business that everyone thought then legacy TV is in a much worse position. Considerably worse.
@TVGrimReaper They are an international service (There are good reasons that they don't disclose subscriptions by country), they have good reasons to worry with Amazon Prime going after them in Latin America(Where they still lead but it's easy to spot vulnerabilities).
@TVGrimReaper Less time spent on service eventually means losing subscribers, specially considering the type of subscribers that they have, that favors quantity over quality.
@TVGrimReaper I don't know if they have good ideas to grow. Specially because they aren't an "utility", they are a large streaming service fragmented all over the world, and that has issues of their own. Both for sports, reality shows and scripted content.
@TVGrimReaper Precisely because they rely on a dying source of revenue that they need the best management that they can find. Such management would have to take difficult decisions, but they aren't not the people that Ellison's kid has been hiring.
@TVGrimReaper@HumanoidHistory The Brazilian example of CazeTV/Livemode on YouTube has shown that if you want "reach" then you'll be better served by YouTube than by antenna TV, even with Tubi/Roku/Whatever service with weird names that Lachlan overspends buying
@TVGrimReaper@Lucas_Shaw I think that's why they wanted to buy WBD, to try to control the libraries that those free services rely on. They are in a tough spot, they relied on having relatively high margins while avoiding making big spending on content and sports.
@biancoresearch@james_j_otis@donnelly_brent People in Europe and LatAm were maybe more skeptical because we knew that if oil went to 150 then BYD and Geely would gain even more marketshare. The old line about the Stone Age not ending with the end of stones is true as ever.
@UshioTheOmega@TVGrimReaper No, they own Sky, it's much bigger than the Versant channels. Besides that, the idea that distribution is money losing but production, that's expensive, being a moneymaker is not true.
@screwgie@TVGrimReaper Jobs was a big fan of Akio Morita and Sony under his leadership and saw how disastrous the Columbia deal was for Sony. Sony is a big reason why pure tech companies aren't buying legacy studios.
@TVGrimReaper They don't have a lot of space to grow the number of subscribers, specially now, that Amazon is leveraging Prime to go after Mercado Libre in LatAm. And live sports is too complicated and expensive. It looks like they are hitting a wall.
@TVGrimReaper I think Disney buying Vice would make more sense than the Paramount-WBD deal. Even if it's a leveraged buyout and Ellison's kid can throw the bill to Daddy, WBD employees and the Qataris when things inevitably go wrong.
@TVGrimReaper This probably means that any merge between Fox and News Corp is unlikely to happen under Rupert and Lachlan, unless they want to have activist investors forcing them to stop subsidizing newspapers.
@RossMcGivern@kpgamingz@TVGrimReaper 2030. I think that the issue for Paramount is that UEFA still cares about exposure and competing against ESPN and ABC in this department could get costly. https://t.co/Boikw1an6q
@TVGrimReaper I think that the calculation for Disney is that ESPN can be used to leverage to increase the number of subscribers to Disney+ and then attract visitors to the parks. But I don't know if they are willing to have ESPN as a loss leader.